What's a standalone movie that deserves a good sequel?
5d 14h ago by lemmy.world/u/FenrirIII in asklemmy
It's all wishful thinking, so go crazy.
The correct answer is District 9.
However, I find I'm often disappointed by sequels to great movies. I feel like there are far more mediocre movies that failed to fully explore the depths of a good concept, where a sequel (perhaps in a different genre) would retroactivel make the first movie better.
For that, I also choose Johnny Mnemonic.
Also, In Time, Elysium, or Chappie.
I also think now would be a great time for a Galaxy Quest sequel. There's a lot of fertile sci-fi tropes that could make for another hilarious movie. Like, after the end of the revival of the original show, there's a Next Generation spin-off that overshadows the original, plus a bunch of expanded universe content. The Thermians and other aliens keep replicating the nonsense as real technology. What remains of the OG crew has to convince the new cast and writers/showrunners to stop being so lazy in their hand-wavy rushed bullshit, because there are very real consequences to poorly executed cash grabs full of plot holes and dangling threads. Maybe there's a prequel series that creates a schism in the Thermian society, with the older generation following the Never Give Up, Never Surrender idealism, and the younger generation believing in a grittier, cynical imperialistic ideology.
Johnny Mnemonic is based of a short story of the same name by William Gibson. It's set in the same world as Neuromancer and his other cyberpunk. If you want to see it explored more, I recommend reading those.
Huh, I read Neuromancer a long time ago, but I forget almost everything about it. Would that make a good film?
It was one of the main inspirations for the Matrix so it sort of has been made.
But yeah I could see a Neuromancer movie being good too! I can't remember exactly how similar Neuro was to the Matrix because it has been so long but it did have the concept of "plugging in" to the network at least
edit Neuromancer TV series is coming soon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromancer_(TV_series)
I think it is funny that Keanu is the lead in both movies, one where a bunch of data is shoved in his head and another where he is shoved into a bunch of data.
It would take one hell of a director but maybe. The descriptions of a lot of things in the book are abstract and weird. Things and ideas are sometimes described as if you are already familiar with them and the world. It would take someone with vision. I'm also worried that if it were done well, it may not have a wide enough appeal to please the execs at the box office.
Apple is making it into a TV show right now, and I'm expecting to be disappointed. Most media has been too Netflixified.
I hadn't hear about that, but I think of all the streaming content producers, Apple has the best track record for producing quality content. But yeah, the fact that I barely remember reading Neuromancer, and what I do remember was confusion, I bet that's a tough needle to thread.
https://thedirect.com/article/district-10-movie-sequel
A District 9 sequel is in the works.
“In the works” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. They’ve been saying that for a decade. I’ll believe it when they actually start filming.
Being 'in the works' for over 10 years is development hell.
The correct answer is District 9.
I dunno. I love that movie but I also think that Neill Blomkamp hasn't made a truly great movie after that. Elysium was fun, but the last act was trash. The short stories on YouTube were great. But I think that he's already given us the best of what he can deliver and be probably should concentrate on VFX and leave the field to better directors.
Also, In Time, Elysium, or Chappie.
I even have the perfect movie title: Out of Time
Or maybe Just In Time. Time Out. Time Bandits, no that's taken. Taken Out, no that was my spec script for the finale to the Taken franchise. Time and Again.
You kinda lost me by starting your post with "the correct answer is..." 🤢
Noted, thanks for your feedback.
The Fifth Element. So much untapped potential in that dystopia. It could be a direct sequel following up on Korben and Leeloo, or a spin-off following Ruby Rod, or a prequel around the previous time the Evil threatened the world, or a thousand other possibilities.
There was originally plans for a sequel but I think there where some issues with casting it under performing in the box office. Also, it would need to be with someone else leading as Bruce Willis is too sick to act any more.
Yeah, I know it couldn't happen now, not with the original actors reprising the same roles at least. Still would have loved to see more of that universe though.
Bruce Willis is too sick to act any more.
So is Chris Tucker but in a completely different way
Constantine.
I know it may not have checked all the boxes for comic fans but it was a great movie with great characters and atmosphere.
I’ve thought about this several times since its release. Apparently I’m not the only one. Keanu was asked a similar question last year but about his own catalogue and he said the same thing, he wishes there had been a sequel.
A few months after that, I think I read a sequel might be coming.
I never saw the movie, but the 2014 TV show was awesome and I wish it had gotten another season. Having the same actor make a few lame crossovers with the Arrowverse did not suffice.
Do yourself a favour and give the movie a whirl. I'm in the minority but as a long time fan of Hellblazer (original run of 300! comics) I was happy with the movie, thought it was adequately close to the material (for a movie, how can you fit the scope of the source material into 1.5 hours...) and a good old romp overall.
The TV show was excellent, quite close in look and feel and Matt Ryan nailed it (also his characterization in Legends but the writing there was lesser for the character, even though I enjoy Legends for their goofy, campy fun, Constantine wasn't a good fit), totally want some more.
To this day I'm not sure how to feel about their trolling attempt on how to pronounce the name Constantine. Which in the comics is "Constantine, like clementine", but in the show and the movie it's the other way.
"Constantine, like clementine"
But…that can be pronounced two ways? Isn't that the point?
Wait, what? Damn, today I learned...
Keanu said he'd jump at the opportunity to make a sequel as well and he's been pushing for it for a while
They're working on a script, last I looked up.
The worst part about Constantine was the main cast.
Keanu playing an emotionally arrested dude was pretty spot on.
And although not a main character, but Peter Stomaire's Lucifer was pretty haunting.
Tilda Swinton was great too. I was t familiar with the character from the comics, but I still remember her role from when I saw it at first release.
Dredd. The movie was only so-so but it was a really good setup for a sequel. Karl Urban also knocked it out of the park. The Stallone version was good for what it was but it didn't really feel like Judge Dredd.
You are the first person I've ever seen refer to Dredd as anything less than an action masterpiece.
When they remade Total Recall, I thought the OG was better because I am an action fan and the Swrtzenegger one is jam packed with action.
I went into Dredd kinda expecting a similar thing, but nah. It's way better than the Stallone one as a action movie. The Stallone one I now consider a comedy, instead. "Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and OK for you."
For Total Recall, the point was that the state of the film was ambiguious. Were the events on screen the memories bought and paid for, or was it a real spy thriller.
The remake answeres that question and ruins the entire premice of the film. This is a key example on why these Hollywoo "remakes" are widely panned, they usually miss the point of the origional art and audiences are dumber for it.
Dredd (2012) was a techically proficient, but ultimately mediocre piece of uncritical copraganda action schlock, and a vastly inferior film to Judge Dredd (1995). i will die on this hill.
a vastly inferior film to Judge Dredd (1995)
Now that is a SPICY take, and I applaud your bravery.
I mean the nostalgia runs deep for the 1995 one cause I was a child, but I highly recommend posting this on unpopular opinion.
I'll give you this, the old one felt more comic bookish. But if they do go back to the campy, please give me some dark judges!
I just watched Dredd the other day again and while I had an excellent time with the action, I had indeed forgotten how ultimately uncritical of police it is, apart from hints at some bad apples. We should all be so lucky to be protected and where necessary judged by these fine and for the most part incorruptible women and men.
(I don't know if I'd call the old one superior though)
Eh, it wasn't super critical of the police in context of the distopian society, but the society as a whole was obviously horrific, so I don't think it needed to be. If you ignore the opening chase and the very end, about half the police shown were corrupt. Anderson was a judge, but she was explicitly trying to do good in the world. She was constantly going against the rigid rules of being a judge and ignoring what she "should" have done as a judge. This was presented as a good thing. The movie ends with her giving up her badge (or at least attempting to). I don't see the movie as pro police.
I don't remember watching either of these two movies so I have no skin in the game, but I love it when someone is this passionate about a controversial opinion like this.
I don’t know if I’d go as far as to call it copaganda, but it’s definitely true that it downplayed the anti-fascist satire of the original source material
The heavy use of slow motion kind of ruined it for me a little bit. If it was symbolic in some way my unsophisticated brain didn't get it.
Tucker & Dale vs Evil
They need to team up with Ash from The Evil Dead
Shu. Up. I can only get so erect.
Tucker & Dale vs Harold & Kumar.
A. The Princess Bride. More likely a spinoff with Inigo becoming the dead pirate Roberts
B. Pacific rim. Because we all agree that there is no sequel
dead pirate
I should very much hope not (((;ꏿ_ꏿ;)))
He’s only mostly dead.
A. The Princess Bride. More likely a spinoff with Inigo becoming the dead pirate Roberts
Counterpoint:
B. Pacific rim. Because we all agree that there is no sequel
There's always Iron Widow and Heavenly Tyrant.
I should really get around to those books. Though, I think the author has said that their main (partially spite-fuelled) mecha inspiration is Darling in the FranXX?
There's the author's truth, and then there's my headcannon 😇
The Matrix
I haven't seen the fourth, but I don't think that the second and third movies were that bad. It wasn't Phantom Menace for Star Wars, where the movie just targeted a completely different demographic.
I also didn't think the 2nd & 3rd were that bad. There's no such thing as the 4th movie though unless you count the parody movie pretending to be a sequel.
I enjoyed the 4th a lot more than the 2nd and the 3rd movies. They just felt bloated and pretentious. However, with the 4th I felt that the last act was completely unnecessary. I was so bored by the action and I thought it would have been much better if they had found a way to end the movie without such a large action set piece.
The Matrix Resurrections.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Matrix_(franchise)
The Matrix is an American cyberpunk[2] media franchise consisting of four feature films, beginning with The Matrix (1999) and continuing with three sequels, The Matrix Reloaded (2003), The Matrix Revolutions (2003), and The Matrix Resurrections (2021).
Smith: Things have changed. The market's tough. I'm sure you can understand why our beloved parent company, Warner Brothers, has decided to make a sequel to the trilogy.
Neo: What?
Smith: They informed me they're gonna to do it with or without us.
Neo: I thought they couldn't do that?
Smith: Oh, they can, and they made it clear they would kill our contract if we didn't cooperate.
Everything you need to know about the movie. I strongly suspect that Lana Wachowski deliberately made the movie as dogshit as she could plausibly get away with so as to properly kill the franchise once and for all, or at least until she's dead and someone else can try to pick up the pieces and reboot the whole thing in a few decades.
There's an XKCD for everything
Kung Pow!
Ewwwewwwewwewwoooooo
THATS A LOT OF NUTS!
bettie...
I could dance like that... If i felt like it
Aw so cute bye bye
Léon: The Professional
Did she grow up to be a nice girl or a cleaner?
Colombiana (2011) started its life as a sequel before it changed.
She became queen of somewhere far far away, actually. I don't remember the details; it was a long long time ago.
Heard she became a pedo herself.
Hurt-people, hurt people.
I know it was based on the movie that predated Léon, but I always took La Femme Nikita (the TV show) as a sequel of sorts to Léon. I mean, both movies were Luc Besson, and both covered similar ground, so it's easy enough to conceive of Mathilda taking a new name and identity and carrying on Léon's line of work.
That said, I've not seen La Femme Nikita since it originally broadcast, so I could be remembering it wildly wrong.
dont recall natalie portman ever being in an action flick
Does Thor count as an action flick? Or Star Wars?
i completely forgot about thor...don't recall her doing much proper action though (the movie was fucking terrible, i try to forget it in general).
guess i should have said "any action flicks since star wars"
Hey, she wasn't just in Thor. She was also in Thor: The Dark World and Thor: Love and Thunder!
V
She was in Heat , but not in an action role.
Trick question. A good standalone movie doesn't need or want a sequel.
I feel like too often people end up making sequels to good and popular things that never needed to be expanded upon, and they end up really bad.
A second problem is that if a much beloved movie (or video game) comes out, there's a window of time where you can make a sequel with the same team, actors that are about at the same age, and so forth.
But if you let 20 years go by, that team is gone. Some may be retired, some are doing other things and won't come back, actors will have aged, etc. You're going to have a hard time assembling a group with the same chemistry again.
I think that in many cases, it's better to do a similar work. Like, okay, say you like a space opera like Battlestar Galactica or Firefly or something. I liked both. But...trying to do more of same is going to be a tall order. A lot of times a new team tries to get continuity by lots of in-jokes or allusions to the original that the original team probably wouldn't have, and I think that that can be a negative. If it's a live movie, it's probably going to be hard to get ahold of props from the original and such any more. Like, I'd rather just have someone go do a new, good space opera in the same vein that tries to emulate the good bits of what I liked about the original. A spiritual successor rather than an actual one.
I'm not saying that it has never been the case that there have been good sequels done by other people. I like the Fallout video game series, and it's had a variety of teams and companies that have done entries. But I think that there have been a large proportion of attempts to build on past IP using a new team that just don't work out.
Agreed. There are a lot of posts in here about movies that are great as standalone movies.
Crouching Tiger 2 was a terrible idea
Titanic. Rose Dawson struggling to make it as an actress while staying under the radar of Cal and her mother.
And then 25 years later she books passage on the Hindenburg because she’s afraid of ships.
It could be fun to watch a sequel of her getting PTSD'd by yet another mode of transportation after getting railed by some lower class riffraff.
Already done 🫠 https://m.imdb.com/title/tt1640571/
1.7/10, nice
There are several of these. Like https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0081400/
and drowning her bf.
The Matrix
https://xkcd.com/566/
You mean they should make a 5th one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Matrix_(franchise)/
No, they should make a second one.
I am of course referring to the old joke where people deny the existence of the sequels. Not that I was aware of a fourth.
Ah, sorry. I was out of the loop
I can't believe they didn't make a second Superbad. The plot line wrote itself. Seth goes to visit Evan and Fogel one weekend at Dartmouth. The cops have been fired and are now working as lowly campus security officers. Hi-jinks ensue. Call it Superbadder. Boom done.
Feckin eh!
You're not going to fool us into doing your only job MGM/HBO/Disney/Paramount/...
Joke's on you, we're already in pre-production for sequels to every movie from 1959-1999
Don't toy with my feelings.
None. Stop with the fucking sequels and prequels and spinoffs already.
Your nostalgia will never be placated.
Stop having fun!
Just one more Ghostbusters movie and I can die happy...
5th Element
So what's the 6th one gonna be?
Memes
5th Element
I have watched it recently and the Pedo vibes are a lot more present once you realize Luc Besson is just that. It's a thread that goes through a lot of his movies. So if they make a sequel, choose a different director.
Jonny Mnemonic
Children of Men is the best movie ever for the plot and atmosphere more than the one shot extravaganzas. In terms of what the sequel plot should be, I think further advance in the collapse and despair of the world even if a new pregnancy in the world occurs. Perhaps from the perspective of the rulership leveraging despair for corruption gains.
I dunno, I love that the ending is so ambiguous. My headcannon is that there have always been new children, but they are all saved and hidden by the resistance movement, on an island to protect them from the world.
Making an actual sequel would require them to make so many decision about their world, and similarly to the Mass Effect sequel I think it can only disappoint.
For sequel, Clive could have survived. The Human Project should have had other success in protecting children from establishment, There could have been a lot of children on that Island if fertile mothers were also taken there. Teenagers from that island could be a studio-friendly plot line. There is massive plot possibilities, but the uniqueness of the original was global despair from a lack of human sustainability. In an older more decayed world, the low hanging fruit for plot is a corrupt dead end establishment clinging to power instead of enabling the human project.
Don't look up had very poor plot around theme, except for "I am for the jobs the comet will provide" line. It was still a worthwhile movie. If the bar is better than original or disappointment, then ok, but it's easy to be much better than don't look up, IMO.
For sequel, Clive could have survived.
Ugh, that would make the original movie actively worse. Don't do that.
I wouldn't mind seeing a follow-up to the prestige.
Buckaroo Banzai.
A-fucking-men.
Jumper
It had an interesting concept that could be used to better results
Constantine
Good thing it didn't also get a shitty tv show though
I liked Jenna Coleman as Johanna Constantine in Sandman.
Primer
Except it would probably end up being a sequel and prequel at the same time...
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
The CGI was off-putting but I loved the world building
If you mean the faux-1940s air combat free-for-all stuff, you might like Crimson Skies, though it's a bit long in the tooth now.
Not sure Alita can be seen as a standalone movie, but oh my dog I need the sequel already!
If you mean Battle Angel Alita, wasn't it based on a manga or something? That should have more story.
searches
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_Angel_Alita
Battle Angel Alita, known in Japan as Gunnm (銃夢, Ganmu; lit. 'gun dream'),[a] is a Japanese cyberpunk manga series created by Yukito Kishiro and originally published in Shueisha's Business Jump magazine from 1990 to 1995. The second of the comic's nine volumes were adapted in 1993 into a two-part anime original video animation titled Battle Angel for North American release by ADV Films and the UK and Australian release by Manga Entertainment.
looks further
Oh, you're probably talking about the 2019 live-action movie. Didn't even know that they'd done that. Huh. Kinda like Ghost in the Shell, I guess.
Oh, you’re probably talking about the 2019 live-action movie. Didn’t even know that they’d done that. Huh. Kinda like Ghost in the Shell, I guess.
I found Alite at least entertaining, live action GitS was just boring.
Jumper
Strange days
Only if Kathryn Bigelow is involved. I dread someone trying this and ending up with someone worse than Point Break.
I always wondered what a Grandma's Boy sequel could look like.
I'm more curious of the construction of Dante's house to withstand and fit an elephant.
Good Will hunting.
Fight club.
Truman show
Weird trilogy already.
Really bright kid learns math, goes crazy, and is put in an asylum under constant supervision.
Fight club.
Wait, what? Like, why? It said everything there is to say about capitalism and alpha/dude-bro culture.
He fell into the fantasy of fighting and destroying society as we know it. Then at the end he became disillusioned with that. So where does he go next? Back to work? He can't just hook up with Marla the rest of his life. I feel there could be another chapter there.
So where does he go next?
Prison. Because he's a fucking terrorist.
Yet there's lots of action movies where people kill and blow up shit, but they're back for a sequel.
flow.
Someone needs to resurrect William Goldman long enough to finish Buttercup's Baby while Cary Elwes and Robin Wright are still beautiful.
How did nobody mention "Master and Commander"? It's so good!
Wasn't this a book series?
Valerian and the city of a thousand planets. It's an amazing setting and if you put some leads with actual chemistry in a sequel it could do well.
I read the graphic novels instead of watching the movie and they were beautiful
Stand by Me. The movie came out in 1986 but it is set in 1959...so 40 years later, the sequel is set in 1999. If anyone could write an awesome sequel, it'd be Stephen King.
Jupiter Ascending should have been a trilogy. It's garbage but in that beautiful way that overdramatic high sci-fi fantasy that thinks it has some deep societal moral to impart is, and I just really loved having just one with a female protagonist and her himbo love interest.
@Apytele @FenrirIII I think the problem was that it was garbage, but not the right kind of garbage. I'd rather have another JA than yet another Transformers
Jupiter Ascending is a remarkable achievement.
I'm a bit of a film freak and I have seen quite a few. The only things I remember of Jupiter Ascending are that Mila Kunis and Sean Bean were starring in it and that bee DNA was somehow involved with the latter. I think there were also lots of chases?
Forrest Gump.
Hear me out... As many already know, the original author deliberately wrote a terrible sequel book in an effort to ensure that a sequel would never be made. And I respect that kind of integrity to the point where I intend on buying the book just to support his decision. And if, against all odds, they actually made that book into a movie, I'd probably watch it so he could get some royalties from that too.
I would love to see a sequel to Chappie, I don't think no one talks about it enough, the plt has a couple of holes, but the movie as a whole was perfect in my opinion.
I really want to say Secret of NIMH but another company jumped on the coattails of the original and produced a terrible sequel.
I also can't say Zootopia since it already got their sequel. Same with Legend of Hei, so I'm running out of good ideas.
So maybe I'll just go with something wacky and magical like Who Framed Rodger Rabbit. Probably wouldn't be anywhere near as good, but would still be fun to watch.
Maybe the Toons fighting off computer graphics taking over their business
Christopher Lloyd was Judge Doom, a toon in disguise. Maybe we can get some ridiculous actor to play an AI creation in disguise. Jim Carrey? Jack Black? You need someone over the top that can do weird faces.
Nah, don't represent AI as something wacky and fun. Make it impossible to enjoy the character. Use Jared Leto.
Jared: "what's my motivation?"
Director: "just be yourself."
Oh god. How true this is!!! 😂
I really want to say Secret of NIMH but another company jumped on the coattails of the original and produced a terrible sequel.
I didn't know that there was a movie, but if you haven't read the books, there's more story there.
I would love to see a sequel to the Warcraft movie.
I thought longer than I'd like to admit to, I think Everything Everywhere All At Once could have a decent fun sequel.
I don't know. Most good movies already have sequels, and I can't think of many movies without sequels that I could say I enjoyed or that I would love to see a sequel of.
Usually sequels ruin the first part or don't live up to the standard, so in general I wouldn't push for this.
Most sequels suck. There’s very few exceptions
Predator 2, Aliens, Terminator 2. Fox was on a roll with those films. Too bad they lost their charm right after.
Besides that we have The Dark Knight, Toy Story 2, The Empire Strikes Back, Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan, Evil Dead 2 (if you consider a reboot is okay), Army of Darkness (if you consider Evil Dead 2 to be its own start), Godfather 2, Paddington 2, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2: The Secret of the Ooze.
Reads along.....yep, yep, yep......wait - Temple of Doom????
I guess chronologically speaking it's more of a prequel. Maybe The Last Crusade fits the bill a little better. Both are excellent films nonetheless.
Of your 3 first examples, 2 are terrible and the other is forgetful, while all of them are good movies, they're terrible sequels. I have seen Predator 2, but all I remember is that it's set in a city; Aliens is clearly a cash grab that undermines the first movie, it switched from Terror to Action, and it's essentially the same reason that Colonial Marines is worse than Isolation; Terminator 2 is my personal pet peeve, because it completely destroys the first movie plot. How does time work in Terminator? Easy, it's cyclical, meaning you can't change the past. But Terminator 2 introduces the concept that the past can be changed, but if the past can be changed then there is an original timeline without any time travel, and if that's the case John doesn't exist there, and if he doesn't exist the terminator doesn't go back and Reese doesn't go after him and John is never born. The only way Terminator makes sense is if Reese always went back, which means the past can't be changed.
Check out Sarah Connor Chronicles for a tidy wrapped-up Terminator timeline.
Does it address the "first loop" problem created by the second movie allowing to change the past?
The finale ties it all together (the series at least) in a closed loop.
Idk... I'm kinda obessed with time travel and alt-timelines so maybe Primer?
Fuck yeah, a sequel to Primer would rock. How many layers deep could this one be? The director for Primer is/was a bit of a crazy person. I recommend Upstream Color if you've not seen it yet.
Primer is excellent low-budget hard scifi. Few years ago I read Shane Carruth's script for his scrapped project "A Topiary". It is wild, no wonder he couldn't get the funding for it.
A primer sequel would be so great.
It was called Dark.
Princess Mononoke
I loved it but I hope they don't, it ended perfectly.
shrek 3
We deserve the rumoured Gladiator sequel that had time travel or something
I think he hunted down Jesus in that script
Shawnshank redemption
Rising Arizona.
In a land not too far away, maybe Utah.
Possessor (2020)
Maybe not a direct sequel but man, I just wanted to see more of that universe.
Willy’s Wonderland
I just want 2 hours of Nick Cage playing pinball.
Chernobyl
Fukushima ?
Megamind. That SLOP they tried to sell as a TV series was just a cashgrab. Talentless cashgrab.
Wait, there was a TV series?
Standalone movies should not get sequels because they covered the interesting parts of their setting and wrapped the whole thing up.
There’s this alien invasion B movie called Skyline. It’s not a good movie at all, except in the last 10 minutes it suddenly gets exciting, only for it to end. I would love to see a sequel that picks up immediately after that ending.
Didn't that get a whole bunch of movies?
Lmao it was so bad I didn’t bother look it up. You’re right, they did a bunch of sequels. I never watched them though.
I watched them all in the background. I vaguely remember one of them was mildly better than the rest but they aren't that good 😂
Well now I'm curious.
Ghostbusters: Answer the Call. A good sequel would be a nice change of pace for this standalone reboot/twist/masochistic nightmare.
I liked its first sequel.
This sounds like a trick question.
Kill Bill
Uh, they did make one, it's called Volume II
It's 1 movie.
I have a spoiler for you... She killed Bill.
Rumor is copperheads daughter grows up to kill Beatrix
I wouldn't mind seeing some sort of remake sequel to "When Harry Met Sally" but I don't think current writers could do justice to the OG. Also, what do current gens even know about love? 🤷
Beach Bum
Bonnie and Clyde
Downfall
Lincoln
/s
Zombie films
Haha, didn't even cross my mind. Actually yeah if George Romero had made a sequel to any of those I'd totally watch them.
Huh. I've seen Jesus Christ: Vampire Hunter but not this one. lol