932
472

Lemmy's political discourse when Republicans gutted the Voting Rights Act yesterday:

4d 21h ago by lemmy.world/u/Godric in politicalmemes

One side aligns with my views 70% of the time. The other actively wants me and everyone like me to die. I refuse to acknowledge the differences between them. I’ll actually deploy this lack of understanding as a weapon to depress voter turnout and make sure the second group gets to wield power!

Do you not care about GENOCIDE???

/s

Genocide Joe!

Making sure the party that continually starts new wars in the Middle East gets elected will surely help my cause!

<Trump and Bibi plan a resort where Palestinians will be removed from their homes and likely largely killed>

“Yeah but you support GENOCIDE!”

You say 'Genocide Joe!' like he didn't actually support and enthusiastically aid a genocide.

Good thing he wasn't on the ballot then

Took 6 comments to loop right back around to the meme

Good thing the candidate that was on the ballot wasn’t associated with him or his administration in any way and also vigorously denounced genocide at every opportunity! Right? … right??

Right, Harris sucked. So glad I didn't vote and Trump won instead. That has worked out so much better for Iran and the rest of the world, too. Could you imagine even trying to justify voting in the last election?!?!

Oops, that damn goalpost keeps moving around! Better tie it down!

the goal post has never moved from "try to leave the world better because of me or worse in spite of me, rather than better in spite of me or worse because of me"

What goalpost? The goal is to make things better than other alternatives. Harris was better than Trump. It was a choice between the two. It's very simple. How do people not get that?

It's okay to admit if you made a mistake, it actually shows human growth when you can recognize that maybe the right course of action wasn't taken.

More like supported and slightly reluctantly aided.

I expect there were guardrails that Israel was careful not to cross. You know, like completely flattening Gaza and demolishing southern Lebanon.

It's still AIPAC fueled genocide, but I definitely preferred the slower version to what we have now.

"If it hadn't been for Genocide Joe, I'd been married long time 'go..."

Yes. We must bring genocide to the U.S. and maintain the genocides overseas!

It must be so nice having worldviews that can be fully encapsulated by trolley memes

Well first you gotta gimme an example of one that wouldn’t fit.

I guess the view that I want to articulate could be represented as a trolley meme with the following changes:

  1. The lever has only some unknown probability of steering the trolley's path
  2. Millions of other people also influence the lever to degrees which are unknown
  3. The track splits into at least 10 different paths instead of two
  4. There are more splits off of each subsequent path
  5. Each path also produces benefits to some actors (not sure how we'd represent that)

If I try to simplify these changes, though, then maybe I could depict my view a bit like this?

Ngl I seen trolly memes set up like this before :p

Perhaps I should have said "worldviews that can be encapsulated by single-junction trolley memes", lol

But hey, that's just theory...

GAME THEORY

Either way, you gotta have your hand on the lever!

Yes, despite my sassiness towards you in this thread this is a true and wise observation that goes ignored too often. My disagreements are not pertaining to the idea of inaction constituting action

No worries, I would 100% prefer the proverbial third track, but it isn't connected yet. In the meantime, I'll have extreme disdain for the jackasses standing around moralizing while the train is actively running people over.

Political power is gained via votes! Vote! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

I mean, yeah, this is why I think my picture turned out pretty good, Because the blue option is the better one in every single junction, but the best outcome cannot be reached by always traversing the blue path. It's interesting to try to figure out which path in that diagram produces the best overall outcome, and then compare that with what produces the best outcome if we only consider the most immediate results. I'm curious which colors you'd vote for if you were at the first junction in my diagram, knowing that your vote does not guarantee the outcome?

i'm somewhat of a centrist so i think it's gotta be somewhere between these two:

Those are both encapsulated at the bottom of the meme!

i mean not really, it's not out of moralism that i choose not to vote for genocidal warmonger red/blue, in fact the moralism is thinking voting for genocidaires is 'pragmatic'. not to mention continuing to votescold people over a year later lmao

organizing outside electoralism builds actual power. voting for slightly different managers of the same bloodthirsty war machine doesn't

While organizing outside electoralism is great, electoralism is still the primary way power is apportioned in this country. Abandoning electoralism is ceding power to people who will use it for evil.

The stakes are the future of the world.

if the 'future of the world' hinges on genociding an expendible out-group and the system is powerless to change that, then i choose to walk away from omelas

Congratulations on standing by your principles instead of by your morals.

voting against genocide and organizing outside a system which can't stop empowering genocidal warmongers is actually in line with both my principles and my morals

Voting for neither is the same as voting for both.

Voting for neither is the same as voting for both.

if voting for neither is the same voting for both, then can we formally acknowledge that my vote makes zero difference and maybe people can stop votescolding?

No, because voting for one is not the same as voting for neither/both.

Voting for the perfect candidate > voting for A > not voting > voting for B

The perfect candidate didn’t exist, but instead of choosing the second best option, you chose the third best option, and we ended up with the worst option because a lot of people did what you did. Thanks a bunch.

Needs to be updated to add the Iranian flag to the GOP track. Man, do I wish there were a realistic way to choose that bottom track!

it's simple, you just don't vote for the genocidal warmonger party, then if enough people do that you win

blowing up/ derailing the trolly also works

And there's no viable way to do that under the current system, which is why the track isn't connected.

i love how you concede that the system is so dysfunctional you can't even oppose a genocide under it and simultaneously expect me to to believe that individuals voting (or not) is somehow making a meaningful difference in the outcome

it’s simple, you just don’t vote for the genocidal warmonger party, then if enough people do that you win

THAT'S NOT HOW VOTING WORKS!

People have to vote FOR the OTHER party, or else the genocidal warmonger party wins anyway!

You are saying shit that is both moronic and factually untrue.

you know there's a non-genocidal warmonger party which could also be voted for.

I voted for them last election and don't regret it

you know there’s a non-genocidal warmonger party which could also be voted for.

No there fucking wasn't! Not one that could win! You're a goddamned liar and you are helping the fascists!

there's no way anyone could help the fascists more than an 'opposition' party which routinely fails to actually oppose them

if the democrats had any principles and actually opposed fascism they wouldn't spend so much time punching left

there’s no way anyone could help the fascists more than an ‘opposition’ party which routinely fails to actually oppose them

Yes there is. By actively discouraging opposition to the fascists, which is what you're doing. You are literally delusional.

if the democrats had any principles and actually opposed fascism they wouldn’t spend so much time punching left

I'm not even saying you're wrong about the Democrats; I'm saying you're wrong about motherfucking GAME THEORY and MATH! Even acknowledging what you just wrote, YOU STILL HAVE TO VOTE FOR THEM ANYWAY!

supporting them uncritically

your religious conviction

First of all, anyone who isn't an actual illiterate moron can see that first statement is blatantly not true. Second, you are not fucking entitled to accuse me of religion, you hateful bigot!

You have been doing nothing in this thread but peddling disinformation, lies, libel, and now intolerance of lack of religion. You need to be banned.

people insisting on vote-scolding over a year after the election are absolutely supporting them uncritically.

maybe blind faith would be a better phrasing, but 'hateful bigot' is a bit hyperbolic. after all you're the one advocating for the people who spent years arming a genocidal ethnostate and suppressing all criticism of it

after all you’re the one advocating for the people who spent years arming a genocidal ethnostate and suppressing all criticism of it

You continue to lie. I'm the one advocating AGAINST doing things that help the people actively egging the genocide on, and perpetrating huge numbers of other atrocities while they're at it!

You, on the other hand, are apparently A-OK with murdering Iranians, Venezuelans, anti-fascist Americans, and too many other thousands upon thousands of other people to even keep track of on top of even more Palestinians than would've been killed under the ONLY alternative. And you're apparently likewise A-OK with destroying democracy, the rule of law, the global environment, and everything else while you're at it. You apparently love corruption. You apparently love child rape. You even apparently love genocide, because your actions do not match your words and the actual result of your actions resulted in MORE of it.

You endorse every atrocity because the lesser-evil candidate didn't pass your demented purity test. That is what actual fucking evil looks like.

You, on the other hand, are apparently A-OK with murdering Iranians, Venezuelans, anti-fascist Americans, and too many other thousands upon thousands of other people to even keep track of on top of even more Palestinians than would've been killed under the ONLY alternative. And you're apparently likewise A-OK with destroying democracy, the rule of law, the global environment, and everything else while you're at it. You apparently love corruption. You apparently love child rape. You even apparently love genocide, because your actions do not match your words and the actual result of your actions resulted in MORE of it.

are you okay? you're getting kind of unhinged.

I don't endorse any of that, my vote made zero fucking difference in the election. the democrats eating shit is their own fault and nobody elses. you are indistinguishable from a religious zealot lmao

are you okay? you’re getting kind of unhinged.

I'm sick and tired of people like you ruining the future of my children (let alone everybody else's) through your sheer fucking stupidity. And you're still trying to make it worse by continuing to spread your disinformation!

I don’t endorse any of that

Yes, you do! YES YOU DO! That's what refusing to practice harm reduction does: it endorses the harm. That blood absolutely is on your hands, whether you admit it to yourself or not!

me:

the democrats have no principles and don't actually oppose fascism

you:

I’m not even saying you’re wrong about the Democrats

the democrats are not credible opponents of fascism, the only people responsible for their failures are them.

you can blame me all you like, but i think the people enabling a feckless opposition in the face of climate catastrophe and rising fascism are the ones fucking things up for your kids.

the democrats are not credible opponents of fascism

And yet there is no other alternative that actually exists, so we're stuck with them, credible or not! The only -- only! -- way forward that has even a slim chance of success is to try to get better people to win Democratic primaries, not to suicidally punish them in the general election. At that point, they're the least-bad option no matter how feckless they are!

That's reality in accordance with the cold hard math of game theory, and nobody gives a fuck if you like it.

Can you explain this to me like I'm dumb? Cause I am. Is this making fun of the people who choose someone who's literally not connected to the track?

funnything in rick and morty, the very same episode supernova says"what is is-rayel" referring to israel, rick and morty and FAMILY guy are 1 of the 2 shows that poke fun of the ridiculous of hte gaza/palestine conflict.

So, actually that question though? Genocide used to be a really, really bad thing, and here you're making light of it. I feel like people have lost the plot a bit if they talk about an actual genocide like this. "Yeah, sure they committed a bit of genocide, but have you seen the other guy?" I feel like I'm losing my mind

We have had years of constant video footage of it happening. Being desensitized is bound to happen.

I don't know what kind of person could look at parents being handed the remains of their child in plastic baggies and at any point in their life go "oh wow are they still going on about the genocide?"

That isn’t what they were saying tho.

No, no one is saying those words exactly. But I see the sentiment be expressed in threads like this over and over, and it just doesn't compute.

Yes, genocide is bad. You know what's worse? MORE genocide. That's what we got from people not voting because of it.

If you market yourself as being against fascism, maybe don't vehemently support a different fascist regime and shout down anyone who questions it.

The fact that people like you are spending your energy getting pissy with the voters and not the fucking Democratic party who refused to change their stance is fucking insane.

surprise: I can hold two thoughts in my head at once

Thoughts, sure. You've chosen to spend your time attacking those who wanted change, not the ones who refused to not back the systemic murder of an entire people.

Priorities.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you didn't realize I'm a different person.

The two thoughts I hold are "on election day, it's self-gratifying not to vote for the outcome with the highest lows, raising the floor" and "before and after election day, do whatever you can to make the lives of politicians who fail miserable and support better candidates, up to and including civil unrest"

Not voting is categorically ineffective. There may be plenty of things more effective than voting, but not voting isn't one of them.

People love to present this scenario like it's a lever with three positions: candidate A, candidate B, or civil unrest. But it's not. It's one switch with two buttons (candidate a, candidate b) and another separate button for civil unrest. You can do both

The only ones making light of genocide are the ones who helped make more of it happen through their refusal to vote for harm reduction.

No, it's the people like you who are going: people should have voted for some genocide to prevent more genocide, instead of saying something sane like: maybe the fucking Democrats shouldn't have been promoting a fascist in Israel while running on being anti fascist

instead of

LIAR! Of fucking course the Democrats shouldn't have been doing that! Nobody's disputing that! You are inventing a false dichotomy out of thin fucking air!

Who's lying? You, right here in this thread, are ragging on the voters. Not the genocide supporting Democrats who refused to stop supporting fascist Netanyahu.

You have decided to spend your energy not attacking the corrupt shitbags, but the people who are stuck STILL asking them to change their stance. What the fuck are you fighting for?

You are cherry-picking only the things I said in this thread to try to crucify me for being on-topic. That's disingenuous bullshit and you fucking know it.

And besides that...

Not the genocide supporting Democrats who refused to stop supporting fascist Netanyahu.

What part of "of fucking course the Democrats shouldn’t have been doing that" did you not understand? I did, in fact, criticize genocide-supporting Democrats right in the very comment you replied to!

And moreover, EVERY SINGLE OTHER COURSE OF ACTION SUPPORTED FASCIST NETANYAHU EVEN MORE.

You have decided to spend your energy not attacking the corrupt shitbags, but the people who are stuck STILL asking them to change their stance. What the fuck are you fighting for?

I'm fighting for you to quit being delusional accelerationist dipshits who cause more genocide, among countless other catastrophes, through your sheer stupidity!

I ALSO fight for replacing the genocide-supporting Democrats with something better, IN OTHER TIMES AND CONTEXTS WHERE IT'S ACTUALLY APPROPRIATE! And fuck you for telling lies, falsely claiming I don't!

One side aligns with my views 70% of the time

False.

One side SAYS they align with their views, and then do the same shit as Republicans, and kind of just expect you to swallow excuses. Meanwhile we've watched Donald act unilaterally with near absolute power for two years, so we know objectively that the lack of power was (and is) never the problem. It was that they didn't actually support what they said they did.

You don't know his views, he could be really into fracking, small business owners, and war.

That last one for sure.

What do you think I include in that 30%?

Still, this is very obviously the worse outcome. Democracy isn't make a wish. You grow up and vote for the least shitty option to prevent the even more shitty options like an adult. Or you can keep crying about not getting your will like a child in the toy isle.

It was never about lack of power, but upending the democratic process.

Any president could plow through using executive orders, but no sane person would want that, and the fact that Trump is using that kind of power virtually unopposed because the GOP controls both senate and congress, should terrify everyone. Instead, here we are, asking why his predecessors wouldn’t resort to despotic measures.

should terrify everyone.

LOL

People can't pay their grocery bills, rent, get an abortion, and are being criminalized for being homeless and I'm still hearing people talking about norms as if that is the important issue.

It is a massive negative that Democrats, having had the power to change the (air quotes) "democratic process" at least twice in the last 20 years, across multiple economic calamities for workers, chose not to do so. (Conveniently while increasing their own wealth exponentially in the process.)

I want to understand what your playbook looks like here, because any executive order can be erased just as easy as it was signed.

But even more importantly, I want to know what the appeal is of a “Trump of the left”. Do people really think that a guy who believes that he has authority to hold both executive and legislative powers, is going to do better this time?

Someone that actually wants to disrupt the ills of the system could have tried effectively using the DOJ to imprison every pedophile, traitor, and corrupt politician currently in office, that would leave a nice heap of missing seats in the senate, getting a majority would be much easier. Remove the filibuster and pack the courts with a fresh set of folks like KBJ.

While you're at it, use the DOE to enforce radical a climate agenda that disrupts the power of oil. You could even use the climate emergency to justify massive reductions in military presence around the world, letting the military budget go towards jobs programs for local green development. They could actually follow leahy laws and cut all military aid to Israel.

I would have hoped from the Trump presidency, more folks would realize the rules are largely built on biased interpretations and that you can bias those in other directions to make the country better. Now maybe you think I am absurd in my views, but maybe we can compromise a bit further than spending months with websites and means testing to slowly roll out partial student debt relief while giving all the time in the world for the right to send court cases against it. Put simply a Trump of the left would have done the effective thing of simply abolishing the debt unilaterally and giving the courts the much more difficult task of reinstating debt, rather than moving slow enough that it's stopped before it starts.

See you say the same shit as repulicans but thats literally what the post is about. Democrats were never going to repeal abortion rights or the voting rights acts.they were never going to start an oil crisis or a trade war and tank the economy the same way. They were never going to support ice the same way (they actually just held out on a partial government shutdown and exceeded my expectations in doing so). Saying that they do the same is a straight up lie. And I'm not saying dems are perfect. The bar is in hell. But they aren't doing the same.

Democrats were never going to repeal abortion rights

Roe v Wade was repealed under Biden

By republicans. Clearly you've never had a civics course or you wouldn't say stupid shit that shows you don't understand how the US federal government functions.

I'm well aware of how the US government functions, dipshit. You're saying that because the results of your failed strategy are apparent.

Clearly you don't.

You don't 'reinforce' a law when there is established legal precedent because, there is legal precedent.

That's like making more laws saying murder is illegal.

You accellerationists have such a chronic lack of understanding how this government functions.

You're the only one bringing up an idea of "reinforcement".

On the other hand, you do absolutely legislate law when abortion protections only had a SCOTUS case protecting them, especially since it was one that they'd been nibbling at for decades. Which is part of the reason that it'd been a topic for decades, and a campaign promise of Obama. One he decided later to just forget about.

a chronic lack of understanding how this government functions

It's always funny to see the shitlibs show off the fantasy they construct to protect their sad worldview.

Look around at the US. This is your doing. You guys won. You drove the politics since the 90's - and this is the result. None of this was a surprise to anyone but you.

I'm bringing up the correct terms here. When the supreme court decided something was legal there's zero reason to reinforce those legal issues as they are settled law. Every conservative on the court also confirmed this was settled law during their confirmation hearings. They obviously lied. But you can't legislate based off of Calvinball.

It’s always funny to see the shitlibs show off the fantasy they construct to protect their sad worldview.

Oh fuck off dude. I'm a shit lib? You guys don't even fucking vote during the primaries so your candidates never make the general elections. All people like you do is snipe on the sidelines and never participate.

People like you are literally why the left loses so goddamn always.

Sorry to burst your bubble, shitlib, but I am registered as a Democrat precisely to vote in the primaries, which I always do.

You're really showing off that "understanding" too. Keep it up comrade.

The point is that Biden could've made it unrepealable, but didn't

How? By what mechanism could he prevent the supreme court from overturning established legal understanding? Because that's not a thing the president gets to do, like what the fuck are you even talking about?

Court packing, among others. Something the Democrats, who controlled both houses and the Presidency, chose not to do.

https://www.stevenslee.com/appellate/heeding-fdrs-cautionary-tale-biden-says-no-to-adding-supreme-court-justices/

That's not something the president can do, that's a power of Congress. Thank you for proving my point.

Are you unaware that Biden was elected with both houses of Congress in 2020?

Thank you for proving my point.

That you don't understand what political parties are, or . . .?

So you don't understand that the executive branch doesn't control the legislative is what you're saying. You're asking why the president didn't do something the president can't do because only Congress can, and you're also pretending the democratic party is exactly as in lock step as the republican party (which is either stupid or disingenuous to the point of bad faith) so I can only conclude you're either participating in bad faith or don't actually know what the fuck you're talking about in the first place.

Oh, I see - you're busy pretending that the President isn't the leader of his party, and can't use the bully pulpit. Or that Biden didn't explicitly reject that, as the source I provided shows.

I gotcha. Can I ask what the point of making this fantasy world for yourself to live in is? Owning the tankies, or . . . ? Because it's just making you lose your supposed political goals.

There you go thinking the way republicans behave and treat the office applies exactly to Dems again. Obama barely got the fuckin ACA through Congress with a supermajority so your position that the president leads the party is pretty goddamn stupid. Only republicans do that demagogue shit, so we're back to you being bad faith or ignorant.

Obama barely got the fuckin ACA through Congress with a supermajority

Again, all you're doing is making a case for why voting for the Democratic Party is a bad idea.

so we're back to you being bad faith or ignorant.

These are literally your arguments that the Democrats are supposedly incapable of doing anything. Not mine.

Jesus Christ, you ever get tired running those goalposts all over the fuckin place? Like taking to a fucking fox news viewer. At this point I'm convinced you're both bad faith and quite ignorant, so congratulations on being a republican water carrier I guess.

Buddy, I've worn out more foot leather going door to door for the Dems than your mom has on her Dom costume.

You're the one arguing the Democrats can't do anything. You wonder then why people don't vote for them?

Typical liberal nonsense, thinks politics is just an excuse to show they're a better class of person (even if they have to make it up). Nothing but secular Calvinism.

I'll argue democract are ineffective to a fault, even ineffective in a weaponizable way to punish their consitutients for straying from the center. Again, the bar is in hell. But they did not repeal abortion rights directly and never would have.

No, they simply refused to do anything to stop the repeal, of course.

Why are you saying this like it conflicts with anything I've said?

I'm not. I'm saying the difference is meaningless in results though.

It's not though. The Democrats are feckless. You'll see them in the dictionary when looking up weaponized incompetence (OK that has a vaguely different meaning but you know what I mean). But if the right had never gained power, the momentum to lose these rights never would have begun.

Doing something =/= letting something happen

The Democrats being feckless guaranteed the right would gain power though. As many warned at the time.

Its shitty. Its still not the same. And also this takes a lot of blame away from swing voters who would swing right in response to Democrat fecklessness.

Donald acting unilaterally is not just a matter of a color map on the senate chart. It’s also a matter of a well-funded cult of worship that can never allow any dissonance.

Imagine a Democrat, in a majority, introduced a bill to make streets safer and add bike lanes. Imagine two Democratic senators rebutted “Hey, I don’t like that. I enjoy my F-150.” They probably wouldn’t be instantly kicked from the party and have their homes threatened to be burnt down. They’d have people gently try to negotiate with them.

On the other hand, let’s say a Democrat wanted a bigger change like jail time for use of a Nazi swastika, or the death penalty for ICE agents, or deploying troops to assist Ukraine. They wouldn’t really have a guarantee that every single senator in the Democratic aisle would stand against an impeachment action, because they don’t have that religious following; just general shared motives.

Democrats are allowed to disagree. It’s often a good premise that prevents all-out corruption or oligarchy, but it’s a notable weakness to account for when pushing landmark legislation off what people call a solid majority. Other comments have pointed out the original VRA passed with the help of Republicans because some Democrats stood against it.

Congrats on not being brown, or from a third world country

I am both brown and from a third world (both in the original unaligned sense and in the newer impoverished sense) country. You fucked us over with Trump.

The slaves didn't care that Lincoln said in his debates with Douglas that whites were superior to blacks and that he supported an Illinois law against miscegenation. They cared that he removed them from bondage. Smart people take whatever progress they can get.

Republicans destroying USAID is expected to kill how many millions of brown people in third world countries? How many children unvaccinated and uneducated?

But both sides apparently are the same

USAID killed more brown kids in third world countries than most US programs. It was built by the CIA to destabilize countries and foment dissidence towards unfriendly governments (that usually aren't able to provide for their citizens because of US sanctions anyway). Let's not pretend it is bad for the world that this is gone; it is just amazing there are no longer any intelligent republicans that understand US foreign policy and allowed it to go away.

Both sides aren't as similar anymore, as in Republicans literally stopped paying attention to the intelligence community and what they do to project US military imperialist power across the world and accidentally are helping the rest of the world break free from US imperialism; but 'both sides' want the exact same thing, ones just no longer intelligent enough to hide it behind doublespeak.

Seriously pretending USAID was a good thing is like pretending the NED promotes democracy or the US has ever been the victim in any conflict.

Missed your username, naturally you think feeding the hungry is an evil CIA plot.

Not that you actually care about the lives of brown people in 3rd world countries except as a way to generate outrage, but 92 million lives saved is the estimate.

'Feeding the hungry' is an evil CIA plot when the US State department made them hungry.

And yes, as a brown person now in a 3rd world country (technically second world, but anything not white is third world to you people), I do care about the crimes the US does to the country I've been adopted into; including what USAID has done.

Pretending any thing the US has ever done has been done out of benevolence is, at best, pure willful ignorance. Ask someone in a country that has been affected by USAID why USAID was necessary sometime. Go on.

The US messed up most of Latin America. USAID makes things better. Removing USAID makes things worse. It doesn't matter whether it is out of benevolence (the real reason is that making Latin America better means the US doesn't have to deal with a migrant crisis). What matters is that it's better than the alternative.

They don't do it for benevolence. They do it for the soft power that appearing benevolent gives them. Fucked up motives but still a net positive.

technically second world, but anything not white is third world to you people

Then maybe you shouldn't keep using that language. You're the one that introduced it during your first comment

Don't need to trust them. You can trust the literal CIA when their staff says USAID helps them achieve in the open what they used to do covertly and thus freeing resources from the agency (to REALLY focus on the unspeakably evil shit)

USAID caused more damage than help, I am glad trump destroyed it, altho for the wrong reasons.

"Yay for more starving children, yippee!"

Ghoul.

Less debt traps, coups, lobbying, etc as well.

Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APLJle95iZI

Personally, I'm not seeing the us do less coups. Just weaker excuses for the coups they perform.

no sane person agrees with democrats 70% of the time lmao, maybe like 25% at best

Athens was a slave state that only allowed the men to vote.

Last time we had true democracy was probably before we did the whole agriculture thing

One side aligns with my views 70% of the time.

That's an optimistic percentage, and yet still not an excuse to avoid voting for them.

If I know somebody who agrees with the Dems 70% of the time they're basically the white dudes from Get Out.

Never change ml, never change. Mostly because you're too myopic to be capable of it in the first place.

it is propaganda method by the right, like your vote doesnt matter. thats how we end up getting schumers and hakeems of the congress, when less people vote, more conservative candidates are elected, this includes the DINOs. maine is currently fighting with susan collins, mills and platner 2 of them are conservatives.

Let's grant your premise. I don't think if I had a friend who liked 70% of the same shit as me but I found out the other 30 they're assaulting kids, killing minorities, sending money I gave them to genocidaires, doing unspeakable atrocities to ALL of the people outside our shared neighborhood, and being buddy buddy with the other dudes who do that shit 100% of the time, I would just not want to hang out with that guy.

Maybe I'm built different tho.

Wait, who does the left want to die?

Um, the right obviously! I want everyone on the opposite side to die so obviously the other side must feel the same!

Genuinely hard to not be black pilled by this constant bullshit like as if there are genuinely elected officials making comments about "MAGA hunting" or some shit. Literally only one side wants to eat the other. One wants death the other wants brunch. Fucking hell.

They want me dead... I want them to have single payer healthcare.

No I absolutely want fascists to die. A world where we allow fascists to live is a world that will fall to fascism, because fascists don't play by the same rules as the rest of us.

Yeah. I get the SPIRIT of the idea, but MAGA has committed WAY more than enough heinous crimes where I'd ACCEPT them being thrown of out power, but in my heart of hearts on my extended wishlist I'd like to see them all drawn and quartered.

Hell yeah, like most authority, do as I say not as I do is huge with orange dingleberry and his bootlickers.

Nazis, slavers, and unrepentant pedophiles mostly.

So nobody important, got it.

Au contraire, for example any and every member of Congress fits the description.

That might be a bit hyperbolic.

Bernie Sanders has his faults, for sure, but I don't think he's a nazi, a slaver, or an unrepentant pedophile.

So nobody important, got it.

I mean I see conservatives say it all the time they believe liberals want them dead. Like nah just dont be fucking assholes and pedophiles lol

Mostly it’s, GTFO of my personal life that doesn’t affect you. Practice some of that liberty you like to pay lip service too. Admit there is a gun proliferation issue and address it.

It's always projection. The right is happy to murder death kill (see slavery) so they assume everyone else is too.

Plenty of them do. People like tucker Carlson and Alex Jones have audiences. And for God's sake /r/conservative, and practically all of reddit is a conservative hatefest now.

Edit: nevermind, I misunderstood this comment originally.

Fascists.

I'm fine with them not being fascists anymore. But yeah, if they refuse, fair point.

Adapting to the level of discourse here: the left wants successful and lucky people to die

Just when they don't pay their fair share and/or use their wealth to buy legislation.

You're right.

I should give Democrats credit for all the times they held power and still didn't do jack shit about the VRA except wring their hands and pretend to be powerless to stop the judicial repeal of it. (2006, 2013, 2021, etc. etc. etc.)

After all. Actually doing stuff requires effort, and it's unreasonable of me to expect the opposition party to actually oppose things.

My favorite thing about these threads is anytime someone like you makes an actual argument for your position, rather than the ridiculous strawman argument from the le epic meme, the Kamalaposters just downvote and never reply. Probably curled up in a corner telling themselves you're just a bot and they don't need to listen to your evil words.

I think that, after decades of inaction at the incremental destruction of the VRA, one has to kinda admit that Democrats really just agree with Republicans. They own the policy too now, just as with every fascist policy they spoke out against and then either did nothing to stop or actively encouraged.

I tried to understand this but I couldn't figure out how to draw it as a trolley so I'm just gonna have to conclude you're a bot. Or if not that a shill. Or if not that just stupid. Sorry

And it's always the fucking trolley problem lmao. Libs can only hold like two surface level factoids about any given topic every four years or so.

Not to mention, the point about the trolley problem is how it has a million complicating factors but libs are like "no, I solved it, crank on that fuckin lever or you're a monster tankie Chinese ruzzian bot"

Beep Bop Boop

R2D2 scream

Honest take - if the Democrats are in agreement with Republicans about these kinds of rulings, then they are complicit with the slow-burn death of their own party, no? Some of them could be considered political double-agents in a sense, if that is true.

The 600+ upvotes really makes me wonder how many are out there.

WorldNews doesn't even get that many on average in such a short time.

Kamalaposters means what, exactly?

It is a ridiculous strawman as it ignores that in the last twenty five years the Democrats have only held real power for three months and they passed Obamacare with it. It's a bullshit argument based on deliberate misunderstanding of the federal government.

Democrats: Pass landmark legislation to give minorities political power, eventually lose power

Republicans: Gain power, strip minorities of political power

You: "Why aren't the Democrats doing more?"

Every time the GOP burns the house down, they're politelt excused and Democrats get blamed for not bringing enough water. Explain exactly why you think the Democratic Party wanted the VRA to die.

Malcolm X said:

I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”

MLK said similar things. The longer I live, the more I feel this sentiment. The genocide in Gaza cemented this. Never, ever, mistake a liberal for an ally.

Here’s an outside perspective: Regardless of who is in the White House, the U.S. forces other countries under its thumb - using the tools of predatory capitalism, which is represented by the political parties in the U.S. no matter who's in office. For the rest of the world, the only difference is whether this happens openly, as it does now, or is nicely disguised, as was the case with an eloquent president like Obama.

So there is just as little of an alternative for the world as there is for US citizens. Of course, we would like to see someone in power in the US with whom one can at least somewhat reason, but in essence it makes hardly any difference.

This is the reality for the world and also for US citizens.

Naturally, in this system, the logical response is to vote for the Democrats because they are the lesser evil.

However, that does not solve the fundamental problem for anyone. The problem lies in the fact that the US is by no means a democracy, as it is portrayed through Hollywood and all that.

The US is an oligarchic system very similar to today’s Russia. These are simply facts.

Posts like this don’t change the facts: If US citizens want a life worth living, there is simply no way around overthrowing the existing system.

It’s that simple, because even the U.S. Constitution, which was drafted with slave-holding states in mind, stands in the way of democracy.

What I’m saying here is simply reinforced by the fact that in the richest country in the world, there are no social benefits whatsoever, as are more than common in all democracies.

Edit: Since this comment is once again being downvoted simply for stating the facts. The answer is not violence, but mass civil disobedience by U.S. citizens. Together, they would have the power to put a stop to their billionaire rulers. Tomorrow, there is even a symbolic one-day general strike planned - but unfortunately, that is not enough: there must be a general strike by the citizens that lasts until the oligarchy is overcome. This is not utopian, but feasible, if only enough people understand that the U.S. system logically leads only further and further toward what it is constitutionally designed to do.

i like the perspective. the system favors the wealthy class and the U.S is just too big. if it were the size of nyc or texas, maybe. but the coordination required is impossible for the "rebellion". the U.S is becoming a straight up surveillance state and it'll be more difficult as time goes on.

it also politically divided in 2 camps by design and by troll farms, thats why you cant have the whole country do an uprising unlike most other countries. when you have one side that is totally complicit(republicans) turns out Rs dont like to ruffle the feathers so to speak thats why they dont protest, or make noise to enact change.

The US needs a new constitution and a new model

The existing model assumes politicians will play fair, it never accounted for parties gaming the justice system, presidents ignoring the constitution or politicians being bought by foreign interests. There are no checks and balances if they can just be ignored. It's a platform for fascism.

The only independent branch of the US that could possibly make the changes necessary to remake America is the military at this point. Political financing means democrats have too much to lose to re-orient the system back to the people.

Citizens united should have triggered it but trump has made it an immediate priority.

The billionaires behind trump should be completely asset stripped so none of them every try another business plot

"However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion." - George Washington

Should have diluted the influence of political parties by getting rid of First-past-the-post voting and making 3rd parties viable without a spoiler effect.

Dont worry blue conservatives, you've will get the opportunity to earn your incremental change. When we become a one party state, you can still compete in Republican primaries! Shouldn't be a problem right?

the US is by no means a democracy

Fuck off. Tell that to New Yorkers who beat the entrenched elites and elected a genuine democratic socialist.

The only thing you’re doing is agreeing with the people who do not want it to be a democracy and convincing people you mostly agree with to not vote and let the worse candidate get into a position of power.

Obviously things could be a lot better. But quitting the whole system and letting it become worse is counterproductive as hell.

If the U.S. had a majority voting system, it would never be possible for the U.S. to have the government it does. Unfortunately, however, this is a fact. So I can only say: Fuck off - I obviously know more about how the U.S. political system works than you do - and I’m not even a U.S. citizen.

Please don’t get me wrong: It’s great that New York has the mayor it does. But put that in a global context: In Europe, Mamdani would be a moderate centrist politician, by no means a radical leftist.

We’re getting pretty close to an effectively popular vote-based system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

That was a city mayoral election. I guess NYC is indeed a democracy. The United States of America is not.

NYC still has a ton of money in politics. NYC still uses first past the post for its general election of their mayor.

Systemically, there are parallels to the rest of the country. The same shit could happen at the national levels.

Its a deeply flawed democracy, with mechanisms to strengthen land owning and wealthy. But it still holds real democratic potential

How do piefed comments always manage to be worse than .world comments lol

Please leave the internet and come back after you grow up.

democratic socialism is moderate wing of fascism. Mamdani hasnt spoken a single word about palestine after becoming mayor, he calls cuba and venezuela dictatorial regimes to justify invasion. Fuck him.

You say the only difference is openly or not, but there is very clearly a huge degree of severity difference to this problem with anyone else vs Trump. And a notable one between Democrats and Republicans.

not really if you are outside of america, no

Being outside america doesn't suddenly make republicans better or democrats worse.

their foreign policy is literally same

Yes all presidents burn bridges with allies and start wars with literally zero plan.

Literally all presidents damage the global economy recklessly

Literally all presidents threaten to invade an ally on the regular.

Yeah great point tankie.

You may not have the best "both sides" argument if you need to go back over 50 years

Read your own comment.

Your problem is "zero plan", "reckless", etc. Just vindicated my point.

And being tankie is the logical position, liberalism has killed thousands of innocent people in imperialism. Liberalism is a genocidal illogical ideology.

Apparently you don't understand sarcasm. And no there's nothing logical about embracing an authoritarian government, quite the opposite.

authoritarian government

the govt that resists western imperialism is authoritarian according you, this is a meaningless word

You can pretend you don't know what the word tankie means and that ruthless dictators are fine, but no one is buying it

I know that tankie is a meaningless word invented by western liberals so they can cope about their ideology and disregard its evils in name of authoritarianism.

it's meaningful and descriptive. You stand for authoritarianism. The kinds of dictators that use tanks on their own people.

do you think liberal democracy is authoritarianism?

I don't know how much value you there is in me playing along with you trying to trick me into some gotcha which won't work. Tell ya what, if you admit that China has an authoritarian government that murdered untold citizens at tienanman square and still denies it happened to this day, I'll humor you. No? Well then I guess we're done here.

You cant answer a simple question, you know your ideology is genocidal and hollow while claiming to be morally superior. You are stuck in tianmen square that happened 40 years ago and is entirely irrelevant event for most of the world.

Hmmm lol

You cant answer a simple question

Thats a lotta words but did you see Godric's funny pictures?

The US system was designed by the wealthy, for the wealthy. This isn't unusual though as the rest of the world is run this way as well. Giving lip service to the population while doing whatever they want is a consistent theme across all of Europe and the entire world for that matter.

I think you can look at the wealth gap as the greatest indicator. Every single country is currently increasing this gap. The wealthy are in control.

Im glad it's so easy. Thanks for writing it down. We all appreciate it.

I unfortunately learned all of this after I voted for Harris and with what I know now I regret my vote and should’ve went with PSL

Pumpkin spice latte?

should go for greens, atleast they have a shot even tho I dont like some stuff about them.

All I get from this post is that you're a Russian bot account, copaid by the Chinese government, to foment a grassroots movement in favor of Trump on the highly influential and much sought after (in intelligence circles) platform "Lemmy". And that you think that both sides are the same.

Everyone knows that the key to Americans' hearts is dominate shitposting on lemmy

highly influential and much sought after (in intelligence circles) platform “Lemmy”.

LAMAO

If US citizens want a life worth living, there is simply no way around overthrowing the existing system.

It’s that simple

And which party being elected would have made this "overthrowing" easier?

Naturally, in this system, the logical response is to vote for the Democrats because they are the lesser evil.

Found him.

One is a good cop, the other is a bad cop. But the good cop enables the bad cop. So both are still pigs.

Definitely kicked the hornets nest with this one OP lol

There's entirely too many people who let perfect be the enemy of better in this thread

Average lemming when 6 conservative Catholics appointed by Republicans gut voting rights: I can’t believe the leftists did this!

I can't tell whether bots/foreign agents are starting to substantially infiltrate Lemmy or if there's just that many dumbass "both sides" dipshits on this platform.

There are absolutely that many dipshits on this platform.

Time to go back to BBS and telnet...

Eh, there are dipshits on every platform. The world is full of morons with a full range of technical ability

True, but also you have to remember that a lot of us are folks who got kicked off Reddit for saying too many things that pissed people off there.

Yeah, I'm one of them lol

Then we're doomed.

Always have been

They absolutely are. They were happy to do it on their own instances until world defederated from them, and now they figure they have to be active on the normal instances to ensure their manipulative machinations reach the right eyeballs.

I can’t tell whether bots/foreign agents are starting to substantially infiltrate Lemmy

I mean, a little bit of common sense goes a long way here.

And they still use the same excuses. B-b-but the libs and Israel… Like that justifies trump and Israel, trump and Iran, trump and ICE, trump and Venezuela. Seriously, fuck off and stop acting like your hands are clean. They could’ve protested one president being a douche about Gaza but instead allowed another to perpetuate it, bomb Venezuela, starve Cuba, bomb Iran, strangle the world for energy, starve kids, and build a massive Sturmabteilung at home among many other things. They’re the “buttery males” of non-voters.

Yup. Their concern about Palestine was never about Palestinians, or they would have voted for the candidate that was clearly least destructive to Palestine. It was always about their own self gratification. Stroking themselves, if you will.

All their purity test did was hurt Palestinians more. Idiots.

how was harris less destructive to palestine?

Biden had conditions on how Netanyahu could act. Trump has removed all limits on Netanyahu.

Seriously? Israel carried out most brutal genocide when biden was in the office.

My standpoint is this: I feel betrayed by the betrayals, I'm frustrated by the things Democrats didn't do when they were in power. I accept as an unfortunate reality, at least some 1-15% of the Democratic party (can absolutely be more!) is corrupt and cares only about the NASDAQ, themselves, or Israel and ethnostates. That bloc will vote hard against anything pro-American like healthcare, defunding ICE, or defunding Israel. They might even pretend to support those things at times when no vote will pass.

There's also more than a few timid, ineffective Democrats that are only voting for obvious wins, and won't vote against any appointments because they don't want attention on themselves.

A lot of that, ultimately, doesn't matter. That type of opportunistic traitor, or coward, doesn't get much of a mechanism in a supermajority, where their choice to stand against Democrats doesn't even buy them anything; when over 50 seats in the Senate are NOT bought out by corporate interests.

By all fucking means, pick out the betrayals, watch people's individual voting records, vote in primaries, and raise a stern eyebrow anytime a voter tells you they "vote blue, no matter who". But don't pretend you can't look past nuance. We're dealing with a mammoth (R)ogue political party, which is the unfortunate reality, and even cutthroats could decide they benefit from taking credit in its destruction.

I think if you would understand that Democrats chose to keep funding Israel and Ice instead of getting more votes, you would understand why this meme doesn't mean jack shit for the undecisive voters.

Unless of course, you want to say that it wasn't worth it in terms of voter count for Democrats.

ICE is literally not funded today because Democrats wouldn't fund the gestapo. Thank you for your input, low-information nonvoter.

There's a clear continuity of ICE policy between Obama, Biden, and Trump. Today's ICE and its severe fascist escalations would not have been possible if Democratic administrations had not poured so much resources into it.

But I guess bothering to remember anything that happened more than one presidential cycle ago makes one a "low information voter".

Policy yes, behavior no, or do you wanna show me all the public executions of American citizens ice did during the Biden years? Don't be disingenuous.

Democrats have carried out multiple genocides, what makes you think they wont fund the gestapo?

Every Democrat government official since the creation of ICE has kept them funded. They didn't just suddenly pop up in the last couple years. Obama and Biden could have easily destroyed them, but Dems like killing Nazis about as much as they did after WWII when we kept too many of them alive and free.

when we kept too many of them alive and free

Invited them to work in senior positions of the federal government.

I forgot that you guys have long term memory issues:

https://www.democracynow.org/2024/8/30/kamala_harris_cnn_interview_policy_shift

As she touted her support for hard-line border security and asylum policies, Harris positioned herself as tougher on immigration than Trump.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/deportations-by-ice-10-year-high-in-2024-surpassing-trump-era-peak/

This one honestly speaks for itself. And hey, Obama appears as a cameo, too!

Reality is so inconvenient for .ml’s and hexbears.

We have documents full of links pertaining to reality as it is, as it was, and most importantly, receipts for how libs pretended it was otherwise.

Y'all treat it as proof of being bots or spies or whatever the fuck you need to tell yourselves to refuse to engage with the evidence. I smell a projection tbh.

That's why Piefed removes accounts that prove you wrong. Reality sucks for fascists.

Either I agree with and endorse your exact definition of socialism or I’m a fascist? Cool. That’s a really mature and reasonable way to look at the world.

But not as inconvenient as it is for liberals~.

JFC the amount of people in this thread who want a more palatable tyrant to be the next president, is concerning.

Good thing most of these never leave their parents’ basements though.

Thank God the Democrats sacrificed their majority to keep the filibuster

Maybe Dems should try standing for something more than the status quo.

The elephant in the room is that they're mostly bots or bad actors. They're written almost exactly the same and in the same format. When you call them on it, you are downvoted almost instantly and buried. We usually don't qualify to get the really good ones in here, but that's a good thing imo.

Did you know: blocking all posts and comments from .ml makes the fediverse experience way, way better!

I don't engage with .ml

I just downvote everything from there and move on.

I prefer to see the patterns, I don't take it personally at all anymore. I'm a reddit veteran when they were 100x worse.

Welcome to a tutorial on how to block .ml on your personal account.

In the top right corner of the top of the page, there are 3 horizontal white bars. Click it.

This will open up a drop down menu. At the bottom of that menu, you will see your username. Click it.

This will open another drop down menu with 3 options. Click “Settings”.

At the top of your screen you will see 2 tabs. Click the one that says “Blocks”.

Here you will see “Block user” “Block community” and “Block instance”. Click the down arrow below “Block instance”.

This will open up a search bar. Type “lemmy.ml” and click it after it shows up. That’s it! You’ve blocked .ml and will never see content from the instance.

But wait, we aren’t done yet in this menu. Click the down arrow under “Block user”. Now type “UltraGiGaGigantic” Make sure you select my .ml account as the other ones I no longer use. Thanks, appreciate it.

Geez, I wonder why baselessly accusing people of being bots would get you downvoted.

Someone having a different ideology other than your own isn’t being a “bot” or a “bad actor.” Saying that just shows you don’t know anything about US politics.

Interesting a .ml user who defends China multiple times in the first few comments in their history says this. Pikachu face!

Hell yeah I do China is amazing

Unless you think basically any of the problems worsening under the trump administration, which they've had for decades, matter at all.

mostly bots

Where are these bots targeting lemmy coming from you think?

I don't know if they are bots. But I would imagine Russia. Russia loves to have a weak US with Republicans in power and Trump subordinate to Putin, and one way to get that is to have people not vote for Democrats.

youre making this up.

I don't know if it's that way on Mastodon at all, but they're definitely on Lemmy. Why did you attack my comment so hard without trying to figure out where I'm coming from?

if you weren't making it up, you could provide evidence.

Ml and hexbear have entered chat

https://truthout.org/articles/42-house-democrats-join-gop-in-passing-warrantless-mass-surveillance-bill/

Slaps roof of big tent

"This baby can fit so much resentment."

Saying both sides are evil is not saying I can't see a difference. Also it's a lot closer to even then it appears. The dems are better at hiding thier evil. The GOP is flaunting it.

I mean if one guy murders 7 people and the other murders 70, sure there's a difference, you're right.

I like how we all keep posting memes and jerking eachother off instead of burning down Babylon.

Don't worry folks, fascism will just blow over soon, lol.

Real talk, if anyone genuinely believes this meme, they're a fool. The parties in the US, and anywhere else, for that matter, are substantially different from one another.

Namely, Democrats only support Genocides in the middle east MOST of the time, whereas Republicans support it ALL OF THE TIME.

Uh.... I was offline. What happened?

As someone from outside the US, the problem is your side A is still more B than most countries side B by a pretty large margin (Though one that is concerningly shrinking). But we have seen proof that you can vote in a different side B at a local level and that's probably the only non-violent way out of this assuming you (and by extension the rest of us) aren't fucked already.

me when it's been over a year since i didn't vote for a genocidal warmonger and people are still mad about that: sicko-power

Your whole account is bad ragebait

ragebait implies i'm not 100% serious about what i believe though.

also you're on feddit.org, you're missing out on like half my content if you're viewing it from there

I'm sure all the children starving to death since USAID was destroyed thank you for your smug superiority.

the democrats should have been a better opposition party and maybe they wouldn't have ate shit to the rapist pedophile twice

We can hate them for being repugnant & immoral and you for being repugnant & immoral at the same time.

Better than supporting genocide like you do

Where did this happen, and why?

It's just a little genocide. It's not up to them to stop platforming it, stop asking. It's up to you to learn to swallow it.

there's literally no difference between them

Who is saying this?

Usually I'd put some electoral reform videos in a thread like this, but that time has long since passed us by.

Enjoy your 1%er divide and conquer propaganda.

This is only limited inside america, for those outside america both parties are exact same and democrats may be worse because they pretend to be good but trump is too blunt about his actions and is actually exposing to laymans what america really is.

Also anyone voting for democrats should be ashamed. Vote for a thrid party or dont vote at all. Liberalism is a disease

TyPiCaL shItLiB lOgIc

The corruption makes staying in power necessary.

Coworkers

The only time I apply virtue ethics is when someone is a virtue ethicist (I hate them).

the arm wasn't holding the knife that stabbed me it was the hand.

Nevermind about the person why are you even talking about that you conspiracy theorist.

Wouldn't it be great if the republicans lost the house and the senate?

So I really hope the DNC shifts away from genocidal Israel and centrist civility politics and adopts more popular progressive and left-wing platforms. Come on DNC! We need big tent for a big win!

Both sideism is the easiest way to do political commentary.

Also I push Democratic socialist of America when that happens

Claiming both are the same, this is impressive and sad. It indicates a serious misunderstanding of history since Reagan's tax changes amongst other policy changes. It shows people don't remember Citizens United. It means people don't remember the massive economic change the Ford vs Dodge decision had in the earlier 1900s.

We live in a world where it's easier to hold on to a belief than to challenge it. The amazing breadth of information we have access to can be frightening, but it shouldn't prevent you from researching and attempting to disprove your ideas.

I don't see the value of the "both sides" argument. I think vote blue no matter who may have the value of shifting the overton window. But the reality is many of the people on the far left are just non voters making post hoc rationalizations. So I don't really care about their opinion.

It's actually really simple. The coalition required to reform the government includes the right and republicans. They actually vote. Really we should be looking at the tactics used to convert people from the progressive era.

In this way you avoid counterfactual arguments and actually have a path to follow. As opposed to feeling like you have some magical solution if only you were president.

"Why don't everyone support 7 genocides?"

Just believe, and Jill Stein will magically become POTUS. /s

You liberals just don't get it, do you?

  1. 7 is still too high a number. Anything other than 0 is completely unacceptable.

  2. When it comes to measuring the fuckery of the Democrats vs the Republicans, the number is HARDLY 7 vs..... uhh..... I'm not counting Side B's total. No, in fact Trump won the popular vote this time BECAUSE Genocide Joe was worse than Trump and his stand-in did nothing to suggest a change in policy. His genocidal and bloodthirsty policy. No amount of "B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but Trump!" can deflect from his unconditional support of Israel and how he instigated the conflict in Ukraine when Biden is in fact worse. Also Bush and Cheney were worse war criminals than Trump and..... y'all love them nowadays. In fact, you were all HAPPY to parade around Cheney's endorsement of Biden's stand-in! Gee whillikers, how ever did you alienate the anti-war crime crowd?

  3. The Democrats tried (and succeeded) in getting third party candidates removed from ballots in 2024. Not the Republicans, the Democrats. Is THIS the democracy you all said Trump would take away from us?!

  4. The Republicans never would have gotten this far without help from the Democrats in suppressing the actual left. Liberals and the Democrats whine so much about Trump now, but riddle me this: why did the Democrats fight Bernie harder than they ever fought Trump? And keep in mind Bernie just wants regulated capitalism while the left wants to abolish capitalism entirely. He was very much our compromise candidate.