LLMs tend to prefer their own writing in resumes (self-preference bias)
5d 3h ago by programming.dev/u/Sparrow_1029 in fuck_ai from xcancel.comWhy bother with the hiring process at all anymore, it seems. May as well just pick names out of a hat.
I work as a software developer and have had to hire for several positions in the last couple years. The process was not easy before AI, and now it's even harder to find candidates that will even TALK to you—person to person (over web video chat)—without filtering every question through an AI "coach". I want to see if you're going to be a good human to work wirh, not that you can read from a teleprompter. Not to mention the obvious cheating when it comes to the code part of the interview process. If you can't write a basic couple of classes and functions, why would I let you set an LLM loose on the codebase?
Guess that's a bit of a tangiental rant.
Here's a link to the original study: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00462
I'm not even getting phone screens. I don't think humans are even reading the resumes, and when it is a human it's someone non-technical who thinks Java and JavaScript are the same.
Same here, we should start a club
Are you hiring right now?
Unfortunately no -- just finished a round for a new candidate. Hiring comes in spurts when the budget + work allow and I'm not management, just tech lead, though my boss lets me know when we're gonna post a position. Are you looking?
yeah I been looking since Novmember
I'm also looking... I swear my resume has been seen only by machines. It is so frustrating!