The Majel Barrett computer might be into it, though
8h 15m ago by lemmy.world/u/ummthatguy in tenforward
even Worf's "calisthenics" were mostly "that"
Even Bortus' "simulation" was full "that"
"That's what it says, a horrible person. We weren't even testing for that."
Not sure if majel Barrett was into it, but she did get cuckqueened hard on her honeymoon.
AI slop
It's the eyes that really look off to me. Unrelated to the fact that your post is an entirely different doll than the original meme, the irises/whites in yours seem like a "confused" AI not being able to settle on something cohesive. I'm not sure how to describe it, but its different than just a poorly-made doll
EDIT: This slightly higher quality version of the same image is able to shed more light on some of the telltale signs of being AI-generated: https://i.imgur.com/yHYDauj.jpeg
Curious. That image looks like the result of an attempted AI upscale of the base image. The hairline is mottled, eyebrows darker/sharper, lips have more definition, and the blotchy eyes.
Verification aside, it was not my intention to make use of an AI image for a meme as I did not see it as such. Whether that means my perception is dulled to where I can be fooled now or that we're still overestimating the capability of the tech, is up for debate. I'd prefer the latter.
That's a different barbie than in OP.
Last week, some jagoff used ai to "redo" a webcomic into the same webcomic, but worse, and with cats. Didn't even bother tracing. This is possibly an edit or an AI swap / recreation.
This is definitely AI slop:
The other image appears to be a manufactured doll that was the basis for the modified versions. Or maybe it's just been jpeg-ed enough to look more realistic.