This Espressif ESP32-Powered 4G "Smartphone," Programmed in the Arduino IDE, Packs The Essentials
6h 37m ago by lemmy.eco.br/u/obbeel in technology from www.hackster.io
Nice. The 4g module is $17.90 from digikey, much less than last time I looked. I wonder if there's a 5g version. I also wonder if there's any issue using retail sim cards and making LTE voice calls.
the reddit discussion is interesting
Any particular reason?
Why are people so pissed at this FelixCress guy? He is just wrong, there is no need to debate.
Because Felix is wrong and hates technology and the people who make it.
They probably hate Linux and being a vegan queer furry too.
There must have been a phone marketed as ePhone before now?
If not maybe try Espressone
Are ESP32 secure enough to have them directly on the internets?
It depends on the code you run on it, really. A lot of the time, too, 4G will be behind CG-NAT which at least means the listening ports aren't automatically on the internet.
This is ridiculous. What is needed is a support for advert & bloat & forced updates free smart phone, not reinventing the wheel. Yes, someone must be first - but it is about software, not hardware.
Someone: *Makes a cool hobby project*
Internet people: "Trash. I don't approve. How dare you make something that isn't useful to me. Fuck you and die."
People that do shite themselves are the worst.
Someone: makes something completely and utterly useless.
Internet people: voice justified criticism.
Half wits: "how dare you criticise the creators!"
Why does the end product of an electronics learning project need to be useful? Or any hobby project? Your criticism was that their hobbies should yield something useful, but where's the "justification" for that? What's wrong with just having fun?
Quarter wits: "How dare you have fun"
Why does the end product of an electronics learning project need to be useful? Or any hobby project?
So we agree it is useless? OK.
Kind of, it's a pretty shit phone, and the creator is not pretending otherwise. Why are you so offended and why should they do whatever you want them to do instead?
I am not. I said it was ridiculous and led to nowhere with software being much better solution. Suddenly multiple people felt offended by this simple statement of fact.
Solution to what? Electronics hobby? Dictating what people's projects should and shouldn't be is kind of an asshole thing to do.
Read again. Slowly.
Done. It just reaffirmed that you're a dick.
grabs popcorn
munch munch munch
Grabs bag of dicks.
munch munch munch.
https://youtu.be/C6BYzLIqKB8
Dude. It's a hobby project. It doesn't need to solve major global market problems for you. What an absolutely bizarre thing to get this angry over.
Read again.
And I am not your dude, pal.
Pal, my dude, my buddy, you're raging against someone's garage proof-of-concept as if they held the key to the software problems on modern smartphones, and downvoting anyone who tells you to chill out. Lots of people do much more useless things than this every day, so why does this one thing enrage you so much?
I am not raging against anything. I am calling it useless and ridiculous because it is useless and ridiculous.
... And I am not your pal, mate.
And I'm not your mate, shining star, light of my life
I'm sure many people call you useless, doesn't mean you shouldn't exist
many people call you useless,
You must be thinking about your parents and yourself.
Hacking isn't about reinventing the wheel. This isn't a finished product destined for a market. Even if it was, think about the small business utilities involved in local knowledge ("low-tech"): many small producers (farmers, shops, etc.) still use "obsolete" mechanisms and improvised mechanical technology. If that could reflect personal or community knowledge into real technology, even if "low technology", that's already a social gain for those people.
Besides that, it's worth it for a personal project where the end goal is obtaining knowledge about how things work in the world. Not everything is about stocks, and stocks doesn't fill all of the "market" also.
it can make calls, and send texts," LuckyBor writes of the project, which perhaps stretches the definition of "smartphone"
... And you need to remove the screen to insert a sim card. Now tell me again this is not ridiculous.
Take the first one off the shelf smartfone, wipe out the entire software, replace it with bloat free, spyware free, update free equivalent and voila!
Absolutely no need to reinvent the wheel, this is a road to nowhere.
I remember having to remove the battery of one of my phones to change the SIM card. It was particularly annoying because that phone/SIM had issues registering so I would have to reinsert the SIM card a few times and reboot each time.
I think they're having more fun making it than looking for a perfect solution. The fastest way to accomplish this is just buying some flipphone from Kyocera or something.
Also it's a prototype. It wouldn't survive in the real world in it's current state.
I think they're having more fun making it than looking for a perfect solution.
Possibly, thus my point - reinventing the wheel.
I wouldn't consider it reinventing the wheel. Giant algae tanks to replace trees is reinventing the wheel. They're just making a phone out of parts that would have originally been in a cheap phone at one point (before they got turned into development boards).
If I wanted to be super uncharitable, what the maker did was akin to this.
https://youtu.be/d59J78yhwtg
I wouldn't consider it reinventing the wheel
I do. What they are trying to create already exists. What is really needed is non intrusive software rather than hardware.
Which already exists and has existed for ages.
Lineage os (Android), e/os (Android), postmarket os (straight up Linux) would all be excellent answers for cutdown/debloatable mobile phone OSes. (also Ubuntu touch and whatever the pinephone shipped with)
Its probably a lot harder making an unintrusive os than it is making this.
This is cutdown hardware leading to simplified and cutdown software as it's a necessity here.
This is cutdown hardware leading to simplified and cutdown software as it's a necessity here.
I strongly disagree. Spyware, bloatware, forced updates etc are a function of profit driven choice, not the necessity.
I'm not sure if I'm missing something or not.
I was referring to the Arduino phone. In general you're not wrong.
The scope of the conversation is just the phone itself.
Hardware was designed first, and then they applied software.
Edit: when I meant necessity for the cut down software. I meant it as in "the Arduino is barely fast enough to run the software, any extraneous thing needs to go"
Hardware was designed first, and then they applied software.
You don't need to redesign a hardware. It is software which needs redesigning, within the existing hardware.
Which already has been redesigned by people who know what they're doing. This is just someone making a minimalist phone.
I do not think you understand what a hobby prototype means, educate yourself then come talk amongst adults
My son put a lego car toghther yesterday. Look, a hobby prototype! 🙄
Congratulations, looks like your son has a chance to grow up to be a sensible and creative adult, unlike his wet fart of a father
I wonder how many fucking morons will try to defend this idiocy. Congratulations, you are on the level of 5y/o and so is the creator of this useless junk.
... And you need to remove the screen to insert a sim card. Now tell me again this is not ridiculous.
Lmao, it prob doesn't even have a working software kit, you would have to arduino some shit yourself.
I don't think you understood what this is & who is it for.
but it is about software, not hardware.
Hey Bestie! Sorry, but you are absolutely wrong here. 😊
There are several options for free and open source software for mobile applications, and it only works with a teeny tiny sliver of the available hardware because almost none of the hardware is even remotely open. 😭
At this stage, it is absolutely about hardware that actually supports the Open Source community, because all the software imaginable is useless if it can't run on any available hardware! 😁
Kthx, Lots of Love! 🤩
They are all shit except jello may be. If it was that good it will be a tsunami into the market. You cannot make a phone with such a poor hardware. 4G said it all
I like Jello! My favorite flavor is Lime, how about you? 😃
Also, 4G was the dominant mobile technology for over 10 years, there are probably close to 10 BILLION 4G phones on the planet, WOW! 🤯 It sure seems like someone was able to make a phone with such hardware!
This poster has never made an LED blink and it shows.