Watching AI companies complain that their intellectual property is not being respected will never stop being hilarious
9d 14h ago by infosec.pub/u/cm0002 in funny@sh.itjust.works from infosec.pub
Also pictured here: Anthropic stating out loud their models will just give out all the "secret" and "secured" internal data to anyone who asks.
Of course, that's by design. LLMs can't have any barrier between data and instructions, so they can never be secure.
Distillation is using one model to train another. It's not really about leaking data.
Claude was used to generate censorship-safe alternatives to politically sensitive queries like questions about dissidents, party leaders, or authoritarianism, likely in order to train DeepSeek’s own models to steer conversations away from censored topics
But you're right, prompt injection/jailbreaking is still trivial too.
The AI companies are inbreeding intentionally now? Wonderful!
Here's the Anthropic post.
When they steal: Innovative approach to knowledge acquisition
When others steal: A threat to free market by IP violation