They have a point...
2d 11h ago by piefed.blahaj.zone/u/LadyButterfly in microblogmemes from piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone
Jfc how are people still talking about generations?
Exasperation, not a genuine question ^
Because it is an effective distraction from the actual problem which is class war.
Billionaires and their followers are the problem, not people of a certain age, gender, skin colour etc. etc.
In all seriousness, it is mostly cis men doing this.
edit: this was meant to be a joke, but honestly the amount of mansplaining in this thread and the responses below this comment has unfortunately altered this into a true statement. What have you all done?
Since men are still getting angry and messaging me:

You're doing the thing.
do i get to do the "i swear it's everyone but me" dance or do you want to do it
I guess "class solidarity" only applies to everyone but cis men.
And then when cis men say their identities are being attacked/invalidated, everyone's like "nuh uh, you don't even have an identity!"
If it makes you feel better you could host a parade or gathering or something.
No I couldn't, because everyone would think it's just some white supremacist/manosphere/redpill nonsense, and likely the only people who would show up would be those types anyway.
Literally every other demographic gets their own "spaces" and "identity groups," and if a white man shows up to those they're seen as invading where they don't belong. In mixed-identity spaces, white men are sidelined because they're the "oppressors" and nobody wants to hear their input, perspective, or opinion. But if white men form an identity group, then everyone assumes it's about racism and sexism. And if a white man self-isolates, then he gets called an incel and a creep.
There's literally no good option available other than to be a self-effacing fly on the wall who passively agrees with everything said by a woman or person of color and never critiques, questions, seeks clarity, nor adds nuance.
Women get "women's spaces," but "men's spaces" are to be deplored. BIPOC get "BIPOC spaces," but "white spaces" are to be abhorred. LGBTQ+ get "queer spaces" but "straight spaces" are to be despised.
And if people say "all spaces are straight white male spaces by default," then why is it unacceptable to boot anyone else out of those spaces? If someone of a different demographic shows up and starts demanding the narrative/vibe/atmosphere shifts to suit their sensibilities, anyone who doesn't comply is seen as a racist/sexist/homophobe. But careful not to walk on too many eggshells, because it's actually offensive to even imply that someone might be easily offended.
Literally the only other option is to hang out in actual racist/sexist/homophobic spaces, which I don't want to do because I detest those types of people. I just want a space where I can hang out and feel welcome and taken seriously while retaining a modicum of self-respect. But this default view of "white man = oppressor (unless gay)" kinda gets in the way of that. And no one cares if I complain about it, or even believes I could have anything worth complaining about.
That's what I mean by "white working class men are being excluded from class solidarity." Maybe don't force them into racially homogenous echo chambers and movements like trumpism won't gain any momentum?
Lol. "They are making me hang out with racists and homophobes" is a remarkably strange thing to say.
I'm cis and I've never felt the need to accommodate racists and homophobes.
Should I feel more attacked?
Did you miss the part where I said that I don't either? I'd rather wither away in isolation than hang out with maga types.
In terms of sheer numbers, however, when a large portion of a certain demographic are made to feel rejected from mainstream society, they tend to form a counterculture. In this case, a large portion of the maga base might not have become so vile if they had found validation and acceptance anywhere else. I'm not saying the maga base wouldn't be vile, but their numbers would be much smaller without anyone to recruit.
Do you have a friend group? Is it culturally diverse? Do you feel respected within it? Or if it's all white dudes, does anyone ever suggest it's too homogenous?
Or are you a loner like me? If so, how do you feel about that? Does anyone ever treat you like your isolation is a moral failing on your part?
I genuinely would like to know.
In terms of sheer numbers, however, when a large portion of a certain demographic are made to feel rejected from mainstream society, they tend to form a counterculture.
Like queer people and people of color and stuff? Agreed. They are marginalized far too often.
In this case, a large portion of the maga base might not have become so vile if they had found validation and acceptance anywhere else.
Those do sound like personal and moral failings. I'm so sad that I'm lonely that imma vote for the racist pedophile. That'll show em!
I'm not saying the maga base wouldn't be vile, but their numbers would be much smaller without anyone to recruit.
Their base is so large because there are so many bigots. The Nazi rally in NY? The people throwing rocks at black kids trying to go to school? The ones who murder trans people? Where do you think they went over the course of our nations history? Did they cease to be? Change their ways? Or pass their bullshit down so their kids can do it too, just more in the dl.
Do you have a friend group?
Yes.
Is it culturally diverse?
Yes.
Do you feel respected within it?
Pretty much. That's why we are friends.
Or if it's all white dudes, does anyone ever suggest it's too homogenous?
Lol, why on earth would I only hang out with white men?
Or are you a loner like me?
I'm pretty comfortable being alone because my job is quite social. I love the ability to throw on some tunes when the wife and kids are out of the house and get some work done.
If so, how do you feel about that?
If I was unhappy I would change something. I just moved out of a red state last month and I'm ecstatic. I left behind a bunch of the sorts of racists and other bigots that you're talking about.
Does anyone ever treat you like your isolation is a moral failing on your part?
Not really. Why would they? Am I being destructive to them or myself? But if it came to that, therapy sounds like a good option.
Fact is, you can blame any minority groups that you want for your personal feelings or failings. Being a bit isolated isn't, strictly speaking, a moral failing. Turning that anger against people who are already marginalized by society is a wild moral failing. No one has to vote for a rapist and felon because they are sad. People do that when they have gotten over the cognitive dissonance required to become a terrible person.
Life isn't about never having ups and downs. It is about how we respond to our own bullshit.
The truth is I'm far more worried about my long-term illness than I am about being lonely. I can literally walk into the record/video game/comic store right now and chat it up with people rn.
Well not right now because my body is acting up, but you get the point.
Like queer people and people of color and stuff? Agreed. They are marginalized far too often.
I agree with that, but I disagree with the common sentiment that it makes it okay to do the same to cishet white men.
Those do sound like personal and moral failings.
I also agree that voting for trump would be a personal moral failing, and I despise people who do that. What I'm saying is that voting for trump might not have had the allure that it did for some people if his message that "it's okay to be white now" didn't have the effect on them that it did
Their base is so large because there are so many bigots.
The examples you describe are undeniably terrible people, and those actions are atrocious. There's no excusing that, and I'm not attempting to. But among the 77 million people who voted for trump in 2024, those examples are a small percentage. How many trump voters were merely disaffected people who felt like they had no place until they were welcomed into social circles where covert racism is normalized? It's a slippery slope, especially in the age of social media.
There's a reason right-wing propaganda is so effective at what it does. I'm talking about the radicalization of large portions of the populace. How else do you explain the sudden shift of gen z toward the right? Clearly it held some attraction for them. Do you mean to tell me all those people were just inherently bad and destined to vote that way regardless of life circumstances?
Radicalization doesn't start from "they were born evil." It starts from nefarious actors targeting vulnerable groups and individuals, and in this case they found a wealth of disaffected youths, most of whom were cishet white males, who felt like the world was leaving them behind and that there wasn't a place for them in society anymore. Do you think that messaging would have worked if it didn't ring true for them at some level?
Mind you, I have some experience with investigating patterns of radicalization, so I'm not simply talking out of my ass here.
And again, I'm not attempting to excuse trump voters. I find them all deplorable. What I'm arguing is that there was a set of circumstances that led people in large numbers down the rabbit holes that led them to become trump supporters, and those circumstances can't be narrowed down to just simply "they were born evil and were always going to be evil." That mentality doesn't help anybody, and it doesn't help solve the problem. We have to look at all of the contributing factors in order to understand the problem if we're ever going to remedy it. Although at this point I'm really beginning to wonder whether it's past the point where it's remediable.
Do you feel respected within it?
Pretty much. That's why we are friends.
Well I'm happy for you that you found a friend group that respects you and doesn't constantly hold your whiteness or your maleness over your head as if it's a moral failing for which you owe them something.
Lol, why on earth would I only hang out with white men?
Only if everyone else rejects you for being a white man. Racists have other reasons, but I wasn't under that impression about you, don't worry
Turning that anger against people who are already marginalized by society is a wild moral failing.
Again, I agree. However, why is it different when people turn their anger against white men as a whole? For the record, I'm not just talking about racists and sexists when I say "white men." A big problem with this discussion is that whenever I say "white men," people seem to think I mean "racists and misogynists." I don't, and that's a false equivalence. I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself by saying there's no justification for racist or sexist behavior. The thing I take issue with is how it's seemingly okay to blame white men as a whole for the racism and misogyny of a relatively small proportion of them.
This whole discussion started because someone mentioned class solidarity and another person mentioned "except for cis white men" or something to that effect. And that seems to be a very common pattern these days.
I mean, I went to college not that long ago and people thought it was white supremacy that I got better grades than them. I've seen some of the papers they turned in. They didn't like it if I corrected their grammar/spelling/punctuation during the peer editing process, they thought that made me racist. I mean, if you want to be functionally illiterate that's fine, but then don't blame me for getting a better grade on an assignment. But no, if a white man gets the best grade in the class then the only possible explanation must be institutional racism and patriarchy. They completely invalidated my strengths, which were intelligence and meticulous attention to detail. The time and effort I put into writing a decent paper didn't count for anything. The stress of being a perfectionist didn't count for anything. People hated me because I was a white man and I got good grades, and that was unacceptable to them. Nothing else mattered, because the very act of me doing well was enough evidence to them to casually throw around labels like "racism" and "misogyny." I couldn't possibly have done as well if the system wasn't rigged in my favor, as far as they were concerned.
It was pretty insulting, especially since I was never good at sports. Like, I wouldn't get upset if you beat me at basketball. I'm used to losing, it's fine. At least let me have my intelligence, don't take that away from me.
I sorta let them win though, cause I was so afraid of being called a racist or whatever, so instead of continuing in academia I killed a lot of braincells with drugs and alcohol. Maybe I'd be less racist in their eyes then? Nope, it wasn't enough. Nothing was ever enough. So fuck it, you know?
What I’m saying is that voting for trump might not have had the allure that it did for some people if his message that “it’s okay to be white now” didn’t have the effect on them that it did
The notion is implicitly racist. No one is targeting white people. No one is targeting christians. No one is targeting cis people. No harm is coming to anyone for saying "merry chirstmas." These are all farces perpetuated by the GOP, including Fox News.
Hate is easy for the ignorant. It is always easy to cop out and say "it must be the jews/asians/queers/etc."
But do you know who is in actual danger? Latinos getting beat by the government and sent to a foreign hellhole. Black people getting shot by cops with their hands up. Queer people getting hurt for existing.
Those sorts of things are examples of being an institutional and societal target. And, honestly, most of the cis white men who have the biggest problem seem to be the most afraid that lifting others up will diminish their social standing. Ironically, most of them don't realize that they aren't really the ones in power anyway, it is the rich folks.
Radicalization doesn’t start from “they were born evil.”
My very explicit claim was that they did it to themselves, willingly. I know people who have pulled themselves out of that filth, even some people of color, and they will readily admit that they were at fault from the start.
Only if everyone else rejects you for being a white man. Racists have other reasons, but I wasn’t under that impression about you, don’t worry
Never once have I watched that happened. It is a largely made-up rationale. You wanna head to the taco shop with me? Just try to talk to them in broken Spanish and they will smile--not because they don't like you but because you are trying and it means something. There are certainly bad people in minority groups, but they largely suffer more than the majority.
What I have seen? I've watched cis white men deny people jobs, promotions, livelihood, etc. And I lived in a red state for a few years so I watched it a lot.
Well I’m happy for you that you found a friend group that respects you and doesn’t constantly hold your whiteness or your maleness over your head as if it’s a moral failing for which you owe them something.
They are out there for all of us, my dude. Being with toxic people is a choice. So is personal growth.
I mean, I went to college not that long ago and people thought it was white supremacy that I got better grades than them.
You may have simply misunderstood the message, which is easy to do if you believe people are blaming you and you specifically did nothing wrong.
What people say more often (myself included as a professor) is that the intersection of white/man/cis is a societally privileged status. "Others" do suffer and are diminished by society's insistence that we keep lifting up the majority.
They didn’t like it if I corrected their grammar/spelling/punctuation during the peer editing process, they thought that made me racist. I mean, if you want to be functionally illiterate that’s fine, but then don’t blame me for getting a better grade on an assignment.
I mean, you do sound (in this quote) like you probably come off a bit unnecessarily harsh. And do you think that, perhaps, your feelings about your cis/white/male status making you a target may actually make you unnecessarily difficult around people who are different? I'm a latino, and people do treat me differently when they find out. Guess why?
But no, if a white man gets the best grade in the class then the only possible explanation must be institutional racism and patriarchy. They completely invalidated my strengths, which were intelligence and meticulous attention to detail. The time and effort I put into writing a decent paper didn’t count for anything.
This is an issue I see a lot with white men in college. The institutionalized racism and oppression people experienced for literal centuries does create situations where white men are likely to succeed by greater margins. How many white people had their businesses burned down on black wall street? We have literally engineered society so that the people we choose to "other" will have a more difficult climb.
Does that diminish your personal contributions? No. Might it feel that way to hear it for the first time? Absolutely.
The truth is that if you have the social difficulties you describe, you likely may not have encountered the experiences and opinions of POC/queer people/non-christians/etc. That is also not necessarily a personal failing. I grew up in an elementary school with a single black child in my class and virtually no one that wasn't white due to the nationalities that settled the area.
I'd ask you--did you receive a failing grade for the assignment that you were so proud of? Sometimes we need to internalize our accomplishments. We do them for their sake, not for the sake of recognition.
This whole discussion started because someone mentioned class solidarity and another person mentioned “except for cis white men” or something to that effect. And that seems to be a very common pattern these days.
For people who are regularly oppressed by the cis white men, it is also something natural to feel. You are clearly upset because of your perceived slights (and not all are likely to just be perception), but there is a wild difference between that and generational/lifetime oppression.
Nothing else mattered, because the very act of me doing well was enough evidence to them to casually throw around labels like “racism” and “misogyny.”
I straddle multiple worlds. I'm white. I'm latino. I'm queer. I'm an education...
People do make statements and take actions that are inherently racist or misogynistic. I was one of them at one point. We have to learn and grow.
I sorta let them win though, cause I was so afraid of being called a racist or whatever, so instead of continuing in academia I killed a lot of braincells with drugs and alcohol. Maybe I’d be less racist in their eyes then? Nope, it wasn’t enough. Nothing was ever enough. So fuck it, you know?
I started out just fucking with you because of the way your attitude comes off. I feel different now.
Honestly, I think you are a dude with a lot of pent up issues about a lot of things. You also seem to have some self-destructive tendencies.
Education does improve our lives and outlook. Start small. Go to a community college or something online. Learn to program. Learn to do some science. Whatever. General courses will still expose you to more people and ways of thinking.
Try some therapy. I really mean it--not as an insult either. You sound like you need an opportunity to vent, and some experienced hands when it comes to self-love. I think some of your issues and concerns could go away with some work.
Is your loneliness killing you? Go pick up some Warhammer models or magic cards. I mentioned some of the stores I did because they are right down the road for me. Will you find some dicks playing Warhammer or magic? Sure. But most of them are pretty good and accepting people. Force the loneliness out of your system a bit. It may also reorient your outlook.
Truth is, what you are actually saying is that you have a lot of things you need to process and that there are probably at lest a few personal issues that could improve your life and disposition if they are better resolved.
No one is targeting white people.
I hear that all the time, but as a white person who has faced bigotry (what some call "reverse" racism), it sounds the same as if a white person were to say "no one is racist anymore." In other words, people who have never experienced being a white person, telling me that my experience has a white person isn't true and never happened.
It gets to be kinda old after a while, so I don't really engage with it anymore. Especially when the usual response to me getting upset about statements like "white people should be excluded from class solidarity" is to call me racist...
You're right, hate is easy for the ignorant. And that includes hating white people and men (not to the exclusion of other demographics of course, but we're already so familiar with the plights of those).
Look, I feel for the Latino community, especially now. I empathize with the Black and Queer communities because I understand they've had it rough with a pattern of injustices. But when that empathy gets thrown in my face, and those very people I had empathy for decide to hate me and call me an oppressor just because of my skin color and gender, things I didn't choose and can do nothing about, then it makes it difficult for me to continue empathizing.
I'm not afraid that lifting people up will diminish my social standing. I don't have any social standing to begin with, but even if I did, I would believe in a world where everyone could be lifted up, because life isn't a zero-sum game. Hence, this whole discussion started with "class consciousness."
Unfortunately, many people do seem to believe life is a zero-sum game, and that the way to uplift vulnerable/marginalized groups is to tear down the privileged white men. Not even necessarily as a demographic, but as individuals. I've definitely felt targeted as an individual for being a white male that people viewed as an oppressor. That's not me misunderstanding the message, that's the people who were targeting me misunderstanding the message if they think that targeting me (a white man, but not born into wealth and social status, and thus lacking a fair amount of this privilege that whiteness is supposed to confer; I've been marginalized within my demographic for having mental health issues and no social skills) is the answer to everyone's problems. They just view me as an "easy target," and who doesn't love teaming up on someone vulnerable to let out all that anger pent up at the actual authorities and sources of oppression whom you don't have the power or the courage to focus on? (/s, obviously, teaming up on vulnerable individuals is wrong regardless of demographics).
I mean, you do sound (in this quote) like you probably come off a bit unnecessarily harsh. And do you think that, perhaps, your feelings about your cis/white/male status making you a target may actually make you unnecessarily difficult around people who are different? I'm a latino, and people do treat me differently when they find out. Guess why?
I mean I know I sounded harsh in that example, but it was retrospective. It's not like I was proofreading someone's paper and suddenly went "lol, you're illiterate." But if I so much correct a punctuation mistake I would get a lecture on structures of power and institutionalized racism and how grammar rules are colonialist tools of oppression and yadda yadda yadda. So naturally I stopped making corrections. And then they got upset when they got a bad grade. Like, dude, you didn't want me to correct your grammar when I was proofreading. Don't act like I only got a better grade because of racism. Unless you want to blame the school systems in redlined zoning districts, but that's got nothing to do with whether or not I deserved an A.
It's that kind of attitude I'm talking about. I could have helped you get an A, but instead you're just upset that I didn't get a D-. How am I supposed to feel any empathy for that?
I even went to an honors conference once, and I was one of only a few white guys there. Out of the other several white dudes, I was likely the only one who wasn't queer just based on looks. Everyone else was either a woman or a POC, and most were both. And yet I had to sit through a bunch of presentations about how underrepresented women and POC are in education. It felt like a sick joke. They must have been using data that was at least a decade old.
As for my "feelings" about being a target making me difficult to be around, I used to have a solid conviction that smiling at everyone I pass could turn a person's day around, and potentially snowball into making the world a better place. So I smiled at everyone. Until some black people seemed not to like that; they glared at me meanly, so I stopped smiling. But I kept trying to smile at everyone who didn't glare at me. The effect was that people started to notice I was smiling at everyone except for those people who happened to be black. So of course they blamed racism, and then all the other black people started glaring at me. So I stopped smiling at them to, until it turned out there were very few black people left whom I could still smile to. So at that point, of course everyone thought it was racism, so I had to stop smiling at everyone. It's been a few years now, and a long, slow fade, but needless to say I don't smile anymore...
So I'm sorry if my feelings made me difficult to be around, that must have been so hard for them. The next time a black person's feelings make me uncomfortable I'll just avoid them. Fair play, right?
The institutionalized racism and oppression people experienced for literal centuries does create situations where white men are likely to succeed by greater margins.
Okay, the Tulsa travesty was atrocious and there's still a lot of institutionalized racism that has yet to be reckoned with. I haven't denied that. What I am saying is that that doesn't mean I should get a C- on a paper that deserves an A just to make people from systemically marginalized groups feel better about themselves.
And you're right that where I grew up was not very diverse. I was also homeschooled through elementary school when most kids are at the most formative years of their social development. I went back to public school for middle school and was bullied for having no social skills and generally being a "loser." So I have very little sympathy for anyone who wants to belittle me, and my refusal to tolerate belittlement might not have sat well with people later in life who wanted to treat me like I was their oppressor.
I went through a time in my mid-twenties where I examined my biases and did all that uncomfortable work of unlearning patterns that I didn't even know were ostensibly racist/sexist or whatever. I did that because it felt like the right thing to do, not because I wanted recognition. But after all that effort, to be treated like I would always be an oppressor no matter what I do because of immutable characteristics I was born with, to be honest it kinda broke my will to even make the effort anymore.
You're right, I do have pent up issues, and I do have self-destructive tendencies. I've been to therapy. But no matter how much self-work I did or how much progress I made, whenever I would go back out and try to socialize again I was always hit with the same roadblocks. Because I can't change my whiteness, and I can't change my maleness, and nobody needs another token cishet white dude in their friend group. Literally nobody wants that, so there's no place for me because I refuse to hang out with racists.
I'm a total shut in now. I have too much anxiety to even go to the grocery store, so I order groceries from an app. It feels pathetic, but I already spent years in and out of the psych ward with suicidal tendencies so at this point I don't really consider that an option either. I'm just surviving, but barely, and every day I wonder why I still am.
I did pick up magic: the gathering for a little bit. It was one of my last desperate attempts to break out of my isolation before giving up completely, but at that point I was already too far gone. In fact I had first learned how to play during one of my trips to the psych ward, when one of the CNAs brought her cards in. I already couldn't sit in a room full of people without having a panic attack at that point though, so after discharge I went to a game shop a couple times to play but ultimately I just couldn't keep it up.
And this point, I'm learning to be okay with it. I have a cat who loves me, and I'm finding enough diversions to get through each day without thinking about killing myself. But still, at least a few times a day, I'm hit with this dreadful feeling that I'm wasting the only life I get, that I'm getting older by the day and not spending my time on anything worthwhile or important. I just tune those thoughts out now. I'm getting better at that. I spent years torturing myself, trying to think my way through it and figure out a better way. Not anymore. I don't have that kind of energy these days, sorry...
Literally go back to therapy. Find a new doctor if you need.
Then find some more diverse friends. You have a lot more to unlearn than you suspect.
Can someone be racist against a white person or all of them? Yes. Is it systematic? No. Is it pervasive? Also no.
Gotta stop with your internalized guilt or whatever before you do anything. Dude. Stop seeking external validation. It sucks but each of us is capable of taking joy or gratification in the things we do just because we do it.
And this isn't "I did try once," it's an ongoing process. Sort of like my bing sick. I don't get to take a pill then live everyday as "fixed," nor will I ever.
You have to treat your mental illness for what it is, just like my shitty body.
I'm not willing to be anyone's punching bag anymore. No thanks.
I appreciate your effort to engage genuinely and in good faith, rather than smugly and dismissively. I really mean that. But I'm a lost cause, and I've done a lot of work to accept that. I'm not going to regress now by convincing myself that I have any hope for a better future.
Literally my last round of therapy wasn't even about overcoming internal social blocks anymore. It was about learning to accept my present situation, reframing "isolation" as "solitude" or whatever cope it takes for me to not wind up back in the hospital again...
I hope one day you discover that this is just you bullshitting yourself.
We often don't realize it when we do it to ourselves.
I was bullshitting myself when I told myself I had a chance to make a difference in the world, make it a better place and live a life worth living.
You're right, I didn't realize it at the time. I truly believed that at the time...
I think it's unnecessary to think you need to make difference in the world. Do what you want for yourself. You don't owe the world.
I tried to stop fascism from taking over, but I was too powerless. I viewed that as a necessary difference to make, and I couldn't do it.
Now people online are acting like it's a moral failing if I don't take action now. It's too late, dunces. People should have listened when I was trying to warn them.
Also, I'm tired of being blamed for systemic racism/sexism or whatever just because I'm a white man. I've never been near the levers of wealth and power. But I'm an easy target, and that's all people care about.
They say things like "you're not being targeted" while simultaneously making whatever excuses to justify why it's somehow okay to denigrate me and if I have a problem with that then somehow I'm the bigot.
It's not fair, but it sure seems like a lot of people are convinced I do owe the world...
Oh, is that the joke?
According to exit polls, no it's not.
e.g. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/voting-patterns-in-the-2024-election/
According to this, it's rural, non-black christians doing this. Men were more likely to vote Trump, but the effect is nowhere near as strong as the urban/rural, christian/atheist and black/non-black divide.
Granted, the billionaires who benefit from this are almost all cis men, but non-billionaire women have been duped nearly the same as much as non-billionaire men.
Statistics don't matter to bigots.
True. If they didn't rely on small and unrepresentative samples (or often the imagination of themselves and others) to judge broad population groups and topics of discussion, they by definition wouldn't be bigots.
Okay, this was a joke but saying its bigoted to make fun of cis men is a new level of fragile masculinity
Triggering the boys' club on Lemmy has accidentally become a hobby of mine. All I do is point out misogyny, which there is a lot of on here, and the club decends upon me. At a certain point the downvotes and insults become cathartic because they're just proving my point. They never even try to convince me that they aren't misogynists, it's just pure insults. At least you got some honest discourse mixed in with the bullshit, lol.
Well that isn't 100% true. There's a bunch that like to parrot b******* crime statistics.
Since when does "in all seriousness" mean "actually not seriously at all, and this is totally a joke"?
Do words mean nothing anymore? There's even a "/s" specifically for instances when you mean the opposite of what you say, and you didn't use it.
That's on you, dude.
Oh my, you misunderstood. I don't care if people didn't get it, that so many men got angry was just an opportunity to make the second joke above.
A joke is also not necessarily untrue, it is a fact that cishet men are overwhelmingly responsible for the turmoil this meme references.
"/s" would also be an abbreviation, not the word itself. Since y'know, you're concerned with the meanings of words.
Imagine if a man were to make a "joke" at women's expense, and then when women get angry in the comments he says "see, women are sensitive/emotional creatures after all!"
It wouldn't be the "gotcha" that you seem to think this is. So tell me, what's different?
Also, just because the people responsible for the turmoil are overwhelmingly cishet men, does not mean that cishet men writ large are overwhelmingly responsible for it. That's painting with a very large brush, and it should be no surprise that people got upset about it.
When else is it ever okay to blame an entire demographic for the actions of a very small percentage of them? What are working class white men supposed to feel when you lump them into the same category as the oligarchs with such sweeping generalizations? Do you see how that might impede class solidarity?
Also, "/s" is an abbreviation of a word, which everyone on the internet understands and knows what it means. That doesn't change the fact that you said you were serious, only to backtrack and say you were joking.
I'm agender, and this person is reminding me of all the mean girls who bullied me for not being femme enough. It's the same kind of middle school logic that said that me not wearing makeup made me a man, and that I ought to kms.
I'm sorry you experienced that, those people didn't deserve you. Bigots exists in every gender, unfortunately...
I honestly think that assholes follow the standard deviation pattern in humans, regardless of biology. It's only when you start looking at categories that can self-select for behavior that you start seeing an over-representation of them.
Unfortunately, I think non-assholes are the deviation...
The mean, median, and mode are all squarely within "asshole" range...
I do disagree on that! The internet is a self-selecting group, and I'm gonna blame Meta, Alphabet, et all for creating algorithms that reward asshole behavior and caused an over-representation of assholes online.
Furthermore, I believe that non-assholes have the capacity to temporarily act like assholes when exposed to stress. Everybody can have a bad day, but that a few isolated incidents of assholery doesn't make you an asshole.
Good point. Social media has done a lot of damage to the human psyche, both on the individual level and the societal. I wish people and governments could recognize this for what it is: tech companies altering the course of human evolution; and take proactive regulatory steps accordingly. But that's clearly not going to happen any time soon. There might have been a time when it could have been done, but that ship has sailed.
Also yeah, you raise a good point that transient behaviors don't necessarily define one's personality. Moods are ephemeral and effect behavior, and just cause a person has an off day every now and then doesn't make them an inherently bad person. I wish more people could recognize that, while also not losing sight of the harmful nature of people who are consistently jerks. That level of nuance doesn't exist in the era of viral ragebait and reactionary sensationalism, however. Sad to see it so...
Okay, ngl most of these comments are just funny stupid man shit, but now you're calling me a bigot for literally pointing out indisputable facts about a patriarchal society.
Chuds are not your friend, they will not reward you for siding with them.
Goddamn, imagine if I were to go around describing feminism as "stupid woman shit" (I wouldn't, because actually I agree with a lot of feminist philosophy such as bell hooks and Carol Gilligan, whom you've apparently never heard of).
But let's just say I did. Imagine your reaction. And then go look in a fucking mirror. Newsflash: you are a bigot.
And then to call your generalizations and assumptions "indisputable facts" is a new level of arrogance. Do you even hear yourself?
There is also zero reward for siding with people who think that if you're not a woman, you're a man.
Turns out, what you've got in your pants has nothing to do with who you are as a human, and I've got penis-having friends who don't judge me for not being femme.
Interesting, could you explain how making fun of cis men equates to transphobia and TERFs?
I see comments like these and I fear for queer youth who do not understand how their oppression functions structurally. Making fun of cis men, who are indeed in charge of every institution this meme is referencing, is not gender essentialism.
Because it's the same reductive binary bullshit they do. If you're in this category, you're bad, lets just ignore the rest of it because it doesn't fit the black and white thinking.
I also don't fit the black and white thinking, ergo you won't like me either.
Jesus Christ you've been so miseducated. You think TERFs care about explaining what gender essentialism is?
Purposeful misunderstanding from, "as one of the queers myself," is also a common engagement tactic by chuds to gain info on disarmed queer people online as a form of intimidation. If you really are a queer person without education on what that even means systemically, feel free to DM and I can provide a reading list.
And there it is. I'm afab and don't want to conform to your rhetoric, and in your eyes that makes me as good as a cis man.
You're a TERF.
Edit: And to talk theory?
Patriarchy is the problem, not men. Patriarchy in the western world is a system established by Christians, where inheritance (aka, power) flows through the oldest male child. Today this expression has softened, but it is still men that receive preferential treatment by society. The Patriarchy is regulated by social gatekeeping what it means to be a man, in order to receive maximum benefit from social norms. This is what we mean when we say that The Patriarchy hurts men too.
By continuing to insist that one's gender is what makes them the problem, you are upholding The Patriarchy, and you need to stop.
Well said. Funny how they said you need education because you are far more emotionally intelligent than they are (assuming they aren't just a troll, which they probably are, but even then).
Okay chud.
How do you justify in your mind that it's okay to make fun of a cis man who has never been anywhere near wealth or power in his entire life, just because most people near those levers happen to have the same genitalia as them?
That sounds a lot like gender essentialism, no matter how you say that it isn't.
Jesus you really want me to acknowledge you again. Check out this cool trick:
You must be seriously full of yourself if you think I care about your acknowledgment. Get the fuck over yourself.
Imagine if a man were to make a "joke" at women's expense, and then when women get angry in the comments he says "see, women are sensitive/emotional creatures after all!"
Having been around since 1978 i assure you this this was the case for a very long time and still very much is the case in parts of the internet.
Don't try that equivalency.
Well in those cases, it's wrong. And in this case, it's still wrong. Just because it's happened the one way, doesn't make the other way okay. Both are wrong.
The equivalency stands. And if you don't think so, then you're a hypocrite.
Not saying one is right, but there are a lot of things you need to learn beyond your kindergarten level of right and wrong about power dynamics and how actions and comments impact differently across these strata. The fact I had to point out to you that men denigrating women is the majority of western history and am now also pointing out there's a sharp uptick very loudly occurring right now makes me think you are not in a position to start screaming hypocrisy because some rando talked shit about cis men on a single lemmy thread.
Note this: I never said it's okay for men to denigrate women. It's not.
Note this also: you're essentially arguing that it's okay for women to denigrate men. It's not.
And for you to insist that one is okay while the other isn't, is called a double standard. You haven't examined your own biases, because you think you don't even have to.
If that's your line of reasoning, then I'm not going to take you seriously. You're no better than a misogynist.
ok that's twice now you've decided to end your comments to me with unfounded personal attacks. You need to stop doing that.
I mean, there's a bunch of other logical fallacies going on there as well. But ending with sniping is a ridiculously childish tactic.
Unfounded personal attacks? This entire thread is about you and one other person claiming it's completely okay for you to denigrate an entire demographic of people. One which happens to include me.
But now you feel personally attacked when I say I can't take you seriously because you're just as bad as a misogynist?
If I were to make denigrating comments about women, and you were to call me a misogynist, would that be an "unfounded personal attack?"
You can't even see your own biases. You're the one whose argument is rife with logical fallacies. And you don't even realize that you're the one being childish. So much projection out of you. And no, saying that isn't an "unfounded personal attack."
This entire thread is about you and one other person claiming it's completely ok for you to denigrate an entire demographic of people
Show me in this thread where i said it's ok to denigrate men. Or even when i did.
Go on.
Now do you get it? You're making shit up and attacking people over it.
You said
actions and comments impact differently across these strata
implying that women's feelings matter, but men's don't.
You also said
Don't try that equivalency
implying that women denigrating men is somehow different from men denigrating women
And it's all in the context of you coming to the defense of someone who basically said "cis men should be excluded from class solidarity." And then laughing about men feeling "triggered" and "mansplaining" in the comments.
So how would it be different if I said "oh, haha, a woman got triggered and now she's trying to womansplain."
Unless you see the similarity there, there's no way my tiny voice will reach you up on that high moral pedestal you're on.
You've basically been derailing this whole time. I called out someone's bigotry and you said "but what about all those times men were bigots!" Well, we're not talking about those times in this thread because that isn't what this conversation is about. Nobody is saying that's okay either, but apparently you can't handle a man telling a woman that it's not okay for her to be a bigot either, and you felt the need to come to her defense.
#notallmen. Hmm, yes, of course, how could I make fun of men when it isn't all men. This is misandry! 😰
Since you're just recycling chud talking points here's a recycled joke:

I'm not recycling any talking points, whatever tf a "chud" is. My points were valid, and since you refuse to address them rationally and instead resort to insulting me (and half the world's population at that), I can only assume you don't have a valid response.
You would pout if someone made light of misogyny, and yet here you are making light of misandry. Are you aware of your double-standard, or completely blind to it?
Imagine a man making fun of women for something stereotypical, and imagine the response you would have. Then ask yourself, are you really any better than those "men" you despise so much?
Like, honestly, I'm politically left and believe in social progress and egalitarianism and all that, but comments like yours make me really not want to care about the oppression of people like you.
As a cis white man, I'm just glad to finally get credit for something. DEI and woke has made it really difficult for me to be rewarded for other people's progress in spite of my mere passive existence being an active stumbling block in the path of those who made the poor choice of being born as they were.
I'm sorry that you've just now realized you exist in a system that connects you to a social order you have little power over, next few months are going to be rough on you I tell'ya.
Although, I wonder if there's a word for the conditions that someone would have to exist under to make it possible to come this far in life without ever being forced to learn about this because of their advantageous position in that system. 🧐
I appreciate your apologies. Few people realize how hard it is to be given every advantage, but not have everything.
Ok, I'm done. These sarcastic comments are making me sad.
The answer was "privilege"
Well, corporations created generational division to blame what corporations were doing.
Corporations created anti-union sentiment for obvious reasons.
As evidenced by articles about the worst people in the world lamenting that those young poors aren't buying enough diamonds, are ruining the economy, killing the golf industry, ruining handshakes, andmuch, much more.
Very seldomly do they mention that millennials are the first or second generation to be significantly poorer than the previous one, meaning that we can ill afford what previous generations took for granted.
Also, a lot of the things we're "killing" are arguably in NEED of killing, such as the cartel-dominated diamond industry, environmentally ruinous and dreadfully expensive sports such as golf, and truly bizarre things like so-called diet products high in sugar and low in protein
Millenials are killing capitalism :(
Gen Xers are killing anti-union corpotation :((
Before the Internet it was a bigger deal bc culture was different but yeah basically just a distraction
People like to have identities tho and like for this person maybe being GenX means something. Like distrust of systems
It is exactly the opposite because the Internet is and mostly has been a way to connect with like minded individuals. Generations are a new concept to divide us. They are less than a century old.
Before generations we had time periods that united us. We all knew what it meant to live through the 90s, the 80s, fuckin disco. It was commonality with your fellow man. Despite absolutely everyone knowing someone wearing skinny jeans in the early aughts - now it's a "stupid Millennial" trend.
https://worldhistory.medium.com/where-did-generations-come-from-e2fb73931a88
There will always be the need to have some societal construct for the grouping of people. People in the same generation were generally subjected to similar living conditions at similar points of their life so it makes it a valid grouping.
If not generations, then what? There is also sexual orientations, political beliefs, race… the list goes on.
Realistically you can’t have 8 billion plus classifications for every distinct person, so at some point there needs to be a generally agreed upon roll up.
If not generations, then what?
Income, average household size, cost-of-living, religious preference, level of education, geography... lots of ways to slice up that poll data once you correlate each polling place with other data. The key here is that it's possibly more valid to correlate with information that is closer to the election date than birthdays that were decades ago.
Oh yeah, you think everyone born in the late 1940s had similar enough lived experiences to universalise them? That's incredible that there's so little variation despite drastically different socioeconomic positionalities, almost like you'd have to dismiss certain experiences that inevitably deviate from that imagined norm to allow it to exist. Of course, there's only so many ways to account for everyone, so we will have to accept these dominant constructions of human experience as something inevitable as well.
I wonder if there's a word for that.
You completely missed my point. Generation is a valid grouping even if you don’t like it. Yes there are others that may work, some may be better, some may not. But it is still a unifying thread. Take Xellenials (micro-generation between X and Millenial), it’s described as an “analog childhood and digital adulthood” that is somewhat that pretty much everyone in that generation was subject to, so yeah it was a “similar enough lived [sic] experience to universalize them”.
I don't think it's similar living conditions but more of significant world events in their lives. With say Boomers you have Vietnam, Civil Rights, and Reagan as examples that shaped their world views. Not all are shaped the same way but it affected them. Like with Millennials, we have the proliferation of the internet, 2001, and 2008. These have seriously affected how we think and act to differing degrees in the USA.
Love the rhetorical question clarification
I got like three dudes genuinely trying to explain it (with wrong answers) within a few minutes. So, seemed necessary so as to not suffer the mansplaining.
That wasn't sarcastic, or not directed negatively at you anyway. Love to see clarification, hate that it's needed
Because ideologies are a team sport now. And people need to feel like they’re part of something- regardless of its relevance.
Because ideologies are a team sport now
In the US? 🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
Seemingly everywhere.
True, but to a MUCH higher degree in the US than almost everywhere else.
Just like all western countries have different degrees of under-regulated capitalism but the US is a near-limitless eldorado for the rich and powerful.
I’m exhausted just reading that much of your nonsense. Let’s agree to disagree and part ways here.
Sure. It's not like it's a good use of my time and effort to try to educate someone who calls objective reality "exhausting nonsense" anyway 🤷
sneering distrust of unions
sneering distrust of science
sneering distrust of socialism
sneering distrust of wikipedia
I'd say their sneering distrust of everything has brought us to where we are now.
Nihilism isn't witty or crafty.
South Park is a real grabbag, but they really hit the mark with Gen X yankees dismissing green energy and environmentalism for being "gay (pejorative)". You could update that same episode and only need to swap out the last line for "that sounds woke"
You can trust unions. They're there to make money and acting in your interest is acting in their best interest.
While you can trust science overall, there's a hell of a lot of capitalism in there, muddying the water. Well-reviewed studies are generally pretty safe.
There is nothing inherently trustworthy or untrustworthy about socialism; it's an economic and political philosophy that is only as trustworthy as the people implementing and operating within it.
You cannot trust anything on the internet, including Wikipedia or even this very post. There are actors with an agenda that can make every article better or worse. There is no verifiable truth, only facts through lenses, and Wiki, being a moderated system, is as fallible as anything else. Much like socialism, it is at least designed to make it more fair.
No. And it may have contributed to the anti science and anti vaccine shit that has been floatung around. Just being a contrarian isnt helpful
They haven't just contributed, Genx is the anti-vaccine generation.
Boomers and silent generation remember what diseases were like and get their vaccines.
Millienals are more anti-vaccine than boomers or silent generation but far less than gen-x.
Gen-x has never held itself accountable. They are worse than boomers in so many ways and some of their stupid has leaked into the infected the thinking of millennial and even gen-z generations.
Blaming Millennial and Gen Z conservatives on Gen X alone is wild. How about we focus on the billionaire propaganda machines of social media and mainstream news. Zuckerberg is a millennial and his platforms have done more damage to teenage brains than we realize yet.
Absolutely critique people and people groups when they deserve it, but this whole generational obsession is exactly what those fucking us over want. Any place to blame but on them is good for them.
I literally said you're generation doesn't hold itself accountable and you're doing exactly that. Neat!
I'm actually Gen Z...
Tf kind of assumption is that?
Ok, simping for genx then. Cool, cool. Cool.
Fuck you as a Gen xer I resent you calling me anti vax. I am all for vaccination and all my kids are vaxed.
"Gen x is the antivax generation" literally means "gen x has a higher % of antivaxxers than other generations"
Source?
I haven't ever looked into this. But it got me curious so now I'm looking. I haven't seen one for vaccines in general yet, but I did find one study about generational differences in opinions on the covid vaccine in particular.
Interesting read, I'm still digesting the data. Seems like, compared to Gen z and millennials, Gen x was more in favor of the covid vax in this study.
Again, yes this is just about the covid vax, but there's probably a decent overlap in the groups
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8882364/
Covid-only will skew things massively. Disinformation wars really went to town on that one.
Yea I have no idea how much it skews, that's why I made it painfully clear. But it does still talk about the generational imprinting of the major events that the various generations experienced.
I'm just translating.
There was a skew to trump among gen x ers. But richer people tend to live longer so that's not an uncommon trend.
Imo, I would expect the antivaxxers to be more common in generations with school age kids because it is media-slop targeted at parents. I'd like to see the sources myself.
I didn't, so you can direct that fuck right back at yourself and your terrible reading comprehension.
Your generation is the anti vax movement. That doesn't mean everyone in the generation is anti vax.
Kind of hard to comprehend your language when you don't seem to know how it works.
You're inability to parse it is on you.
Your choice to attack and dimiss what I'm saying rather than seek clarification, also on you.
Anyone who cannot get over a few weird autocorrects is clearly not interested in discourse.
Your choice to attack
Have you ever heard the phrase "pot calling the kettle black"?
That was literally your first interaction with me in this thread.
I'm calling out Gen X for creating the anti vax movement. No one, including you has attempt to refute that fact.
Your first interaction with me was to question my ability to communicate. That is an attack on me, the messenger by the message.
It is ridiculous for anyone to claim I am attacking them personally for pointing out a characteristic of a group, even if it's a group they identify with.
It also shows a resistance to accountability which I also mentioned.
It's not hard to acknowledge these things are true while stating they do not apply to you personally but that's not what you or anyone else has done.
You choose to make it about me and continue to do so and will continue to do so because you choose to do so.
Lots of genX Trump voters for a generation that identifies with "sneering distrust of everything". Or are we talking about Q-Anon-style "sneering distrust of everything (except this totally believable source that conveniently aligns with the far right)"?
Look up some exit polls/surveys, e.g. this one: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/voting-patterns-in-the-2024-election/
According to this, people born in the 60s (late boomers/early gen X) was the age cohort most likely to vote for Trump, and people born in the 70s and 80s still preferred Trump.
Though age cohort wasn't nearly as good as predicting the voting decision than other markers like urban/rural, black/non-black or atheist/christian.
Has anyone ever told you that “lots” isn’t “all”?
Nobody claimed it was every single gen x? A statement was made that a large portion (in this case a majority) of gen x voted in favour of Trump; which is backed up by exit polls
Do you understand aggregate descriptors? That it is quite typical and appropriate to talk about groups based on their average or median value, even if it is acknowledged that there is a proportion of exceptions?
It's strange because the vast majority of my GenX in all my circles are super left. But I'm a suburban guy with most of my acquaintances in high literacy areas.
Once you get outside of the suburbs, things change. I could see gen-X going full conspiracy theorist, then double-thinking as propaganda feeds them ideas.
You just don't have to be so smug about it, also Millennials have been trying to warn you fucks for years that your blasé attitude towards shit was going to fuck us over one day and look where we are.... Gen X fucking us over with the boomers.
and Gen Z is trending in their direction, we're fucked.
every generation except mine bad
Civilization peaked in 1999, what can I say. Disclaimer: I don't actually mean that, the 1990s were a lot more racist.
The Nazis are back. The late 90s weren't significantly more racist than today. Words were thrown around more. Fewer people had black bags thrown over their head before being deported to El Salvador.
That's right, we've made very little progress in 30 years. Some on the queer front, but not the LG part.
Since the 90s, the political left wing of the USA have stood up to private prisons and monied interests.
For a good example of the timeline of this change, in 1995 Joseph Biden passed a crime bill with a Crack to Powder Cocaine sentencing disparity of 40:1, which disproportionately impacted black communities. In 2003 he was among those who banned PAC money from politics (which wouId be overturned by Citizens United 7 years later). In 2009 he was Vice President to America's first black President. 2010 he was giving a speech in congress asking, begging even, for that sentencing disparity to be removed. In 2022 and 2023 he was pardoning THOUSANDS of marijuana convictions.
I think in the 90s both parties were moderately bad, but now we've got one who are fucking psychopaths but we also have one who can and will save us if we can give them the chance.
The openly nazi people are a society-wide extinction burst. In the 1990s they didn't need to be openly contrarian, because the consensus agreed with them.
A few years ago I believed that.
Now that the fascists have taken over...not so much anymore.
The OG fascism was also a result of similar circumstances. If you look at history reactionary movements always form in the response to civic progress, and for long term progress what matters is the progressive side keep fighting until the progress is fully internalised by society. This doesn't mean it won't get worse before it gets better.
Yeah, but the music was better.
But no, it was a lot more racist and homophobic.
I think every generation sucks in its own special way
Maybe it’s just Americans, brah.
Our youngest President (by a 15 year margin!) was Barack Obama who was a late Baby Boomer. If/when Trump does, Vance will become the first Millenial president.
Meanwhile in Congress, Gen X only this year achieved a plurality in the House at 41% (versus Boomers at 39% and Millenials at 15%). In the Senate, at 28% we’re still far behind the Boomers with their 61% and Millenials are far behind at only 5%.
I’m honestly appalled at how many of us Gen Xers broke for Trump (even more than Boomers), but with our smaller numbers (65 million vs 74 million Millenials), we weren’t enough to push him over the finish line alone.
Sorry my generation hasn’t done more to make the world a better place, but honestly we’re getting fucked more than we are doing the fucking.
GenX has never held any type of power, nor will they ever - not political, not economic, not financial. The Boomers were always like "Wait your turn", but they never bothered turning anything over regardless of what we fought for, or how hard.
And now the Millennials have come up on the other side. And I'm just so tired of fighting to make things happen, or even just to try to preserve things, that that's okay. I did what I could to make things better, and I'm happy for a less weary cohort to take over.
I have fought for over three decades. Never got anywhere. The more effort I put in, the less I eventually got back.
I'm out. Throwing in the towel. Not fighting more unwinnable battles only to then be slandered by the very people you fought to protect.
It's one big free for all since we lower class types seem to be fundamentally incapable of organising.
Only war is the class war, but as long as there are those who want to forgo that for a culture war we have to fight on that front as well. Fucking capitalists.
So, the new Silent Generation (which only got its first and only president in 2021)
Got any examples of millennials trying to warn us “fucks” for years?? Because I don’t recall any millennials I know trying to warn anyone any more than my generation was.
Additionally, I don’t recall ever having people prefix their discussions with:
“So, I’m a [generarion] and here’s my take!”
So I’d imagine you’d be hard-pressed to find any evidence what to support this claim.
And lastly stop with the us vs them bullshit. We don’t need to be divided any more than we already are. Generational behavior isn’t as prominent as you think.
Part of that attitude was that Gen X never had power. The Boomers have been clinging onto power since Gen X was in high school. Gen X could have fought for power, but would it really have changed anything?
Gen X contrarianism is some stupid boomer shit. Its no wonder so many of them are divorced maga conspiracy morons now.
The biggest fear that Gen X has is that their parents might disapprove of them.
At least millennials trust in science.
Let me tell you about how watching the X-Files as a kid made me interested in science - AND the occult!
mostly made me interested in bigfoot. turns out my gran has a costume and her siblings all took turns borrowing it to use out at the cabin or whatever. put a little whimsy in the kids' lives. family lore is that bigfoot's name is larry.
That's brilliant
So do genxers.....
Sure don't vote like it
Not in my country, they don't. Not on average, at least.

This would make sense if they didn't vote for the people promising to fuck it up worse. (US politics only, I don't know how generational breakdown goes in other countries)
Many disengaged and didn't build anything to replace what was missing
Gen X turned out to be more right wing than boomers, perpetuating the bullshit you all distrust.
I'm elder millennial and remember when gasoline switched from leaded to unleaded. I think GenX got exposed to the historical maximum of leaded gas fumes (in the US)
Nah, that's boomers.
Most countries cut out leaded petrol for good when x'ers were rolling around their teens / early 20's, boomers copped it their entire lives well into middle age. The famous reduction of violence when it started getting cut? Wasn't gen-x'ers doing that shit in the 70's.
I've often suspected it's why we're seeing older generations get batshit as rhey age. Lead can be uptaken into bones, and leach back out as the bone degrades. Like, say, with age
There's been a few studies that have been looking into the effect of lead in the environment and its effects on mental acuity as the person gets older. It's not a wide confirmation but the start that as Boomers get older, they are literally going insane from lead.
Okay now do why Gen Z men in particular are following the exact same dead end path despite 0 lead.
Know that quote from Lincoln? I'll paraphrase it. You can fool some people all the time. You can fool some of the people all the time. But eventually they'll wisen up. That's what happened here. It seems the Gen Z men are wisening up, slowly though with reports and statistics I've seen.
Con artists are the only ones courting them.
Yeah, really not surprised
There are some that literally want to kill all the younger generations because they think they're woke. Those people need to be in an asylum.
that would explain a lot
Gen Z has entered the chat. They’re more puritan than boomers
More puritan than the free love generation? It's remarkable that millennials are less puritan than boomers
They were the free love until they became the Me generation....
Weren't they the Me generation starting when they were kids? And they were able to be both, they were the hippies and the yuppies. And free love didn't mean love, it meant "sleep around without commitment". The hippies were interesting in part because while there were and still are genuine people committed to a lot of their higher ideals, a significant portion were the sort to pursue free love for their own pleasure and enlightenment for their own sake. All this to say they seriously pushed sexual culture towards increased freedom
So apparently you haven't looked at demographic trends over the last ten years because shockingly middle aged dudes have become the progressives among males. Not that they've moved to the left, but young men have swung so far to the right, it's terrifying.
So apparently you haven’t looked at demographic trends over the last ten years because shockingly middle aged dudes have become the progressives among males.
It's why centrists are so keen on labeling us teenagers. It makes me feel so young.
Gen X males were the bigger supporters of the Republican party than even boomers in the last election. I'm not sure which demographics you think I'm not paying attention to.
The swing in youth is noteworthy because it was a suddenc change, and the youth rarely support Republicans to much degree. Not that they were the biggest supporters
Young people and progressives don't vote.
The swing is a global phenomenon. It's not just about your republican party.
I don't know why you're trying to argue with me. Nothing I said contradicts what you're saying here.
But apparently me mentioning US parties in conversation about US-centric generational labels offended you somehow.
That's called a self-fulfilling prophesy.
I thought we were known for apathy since we were constantly told growing up that our generation was the first for whom things would be worse than our parents. I don't have a sneering distrust of everything, just cynicism towards massive, systemic injustice in the world.
Self-fulfilling prophecy?
No. You guys need to take charge. You are in your 40s. Fuck you for not taking the reins.
I think they're all at least fifty by now. I'm in the middle of the millennial years and I'm pushing 40.
The cutoff between GenX and Millennial is usually given as 1980, which means there are some 46-year-old GenXers. Sometimes 1978-1982 is described as a "microgeneration" called "Xennials," so if you're making that distinction, you'd still have 49-year-old Xers from 1977.
Ok, so nearly all of them are in their 50s.
This just shows how dumb the idea of "generations" is. Someone who's 51 will have a lot in common with someone who's 49, even if they're in a different "generation". Someone who's 30 won't have much in common with either of them, even if they're the same "generation".
I don't even understand this one. It's this a thing for Gen x? I feel like Gen x is more known for complacency.
Whatever
Exactly, just watch early 90s Simpson's older teenagers, meh. That summed up gen x in a lot of media.
That's just a side effect from the belief that nothing important was fixable because the interests that kept them that way were too entrenched.
It's more apathy than complacency, after years of our cynicism being fully vindicated. A cynic is just a disappointed optimist.
What a dumpster fire of a comment section this is. I wouldn't even know where to begin.
Anyways. It all goes show how counter culture anti-establishmentarianism has been co-opted and usurped by conservatives. This is by design to destroy the field of play.
It wasn't a gen-x thing. This generational thing is a new invention and a weapon used to divide us. They put us in a ring and threw that knife in the circle, leaving us to fight to the death.
I know you smartypants are already typing out the, "hurr hurr generational strife has always been a thing". Just stop.
The era of counter culture had its last hurrah around the time of Occupy. After which the world memory-holed it and entered the era of whatever the fuck this is right now. People too young for that era don't have the lived experience to comprehend a totally different frame of mind that isn't the way it's been now. It's only when they experience a massive world shift that they might possibly conceptualize such a thing. People who do have lived experience of the before times have largely forgotten.
This whole comment section is self evident. You're applying the lens of the current zeitgeist over a different one and it amounts to little more than incoherent ramblings.
I had a difficult time understanding what you mean but I definitely agree that we need to stop focusing on the generational stuff. It’s capitalists vs normal people and if we don’t fight back against that core, from social democracy and democratic socialism on through, the neoliberal crisis will only worsen.
I miss when we used to talk about things as decades instead of generations. After the 90s it became Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z, Gen Alpha...
And yet you’re too young to have experienced what it was like when the very concept of the teenager was created. You wanna talk about a shift?
Cynicism, nihilism and distancing oneself from everything is not going to build anything good or allow others to succeed.
So no, not correct, not good, just a terrible mindset that will drag everyone down with you.
Big "the government doesn't work, elect me to prove it" energy
In my experience, online gen xers are the first ones to say, "Actually, if you were a serious person, you'd understand that Democrats can't do [wildly popular thing their base is begging them to do] because of [stupid, made up reason], and that [Democratic leader's] decision to [do incredibly unpopular thing the donors want] is a brilliant strategy."
Like with hippy boomers, some are still counter culture in X. But more have bought into capitalism in some fashion than being against it.
If it helps, I'm Gen X and I think being anti-vax is dangerous and idiotic, I still wear a mask when going out, I think Trump is a demented pedo rapist, capitalism is going to doom us all and nazis can fuck right off.
Also genX, and unlike the propaganda i have gotten even more left wing as i have gotten older.
Ohhh good old trust, haven't been able to do that for a very long time, I miss it sometimes, but I also know it's never coming back in my lifetime
Yeah everyone loves a parent who knows their kids will be shit so they dont bother loving them preemptively or aiding them in any way.
They make such good parents that make a better world by ignoring and having no faith or care. So cool. Much wow.
As a millennial: wait till you hit your 8th world changing economic crisis we'll never recover from.
Yeah, we know, you move back home after every one.
Is that why our parents keep causing them? Empty nest syndrome?
It turned out to be not nearly correct enough.
Except the vaccine.
Gen X really did perfect the “trust, but verify” muscle 😅 — the healthiest version is keeping the skepticism and staying curious so it doesn’t turn into cynicism.
Maybe instead of sneering distrust, try doing your research and vote? 20% of genx registered to vote.
*in the US.
Remarkably, there were births outside the US between 1965 and 1980
OK? That's obvious, but we're still in this predicament due to US citizens, genx included, not voting.
If it's so obvious then why did it need to be pointed out and why are you reactionary over it?
There is a tendency of US citizens on the internet to assume they are the only people. You are not.